Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:12 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
32.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 874ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (162ms), slowest from Singapore (1561ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
162ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 38ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
185ms
DNS 124ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
985ms
DNS 64ms · TLS 721ms
United States - Santa Clara
1180ms
DNS 128ms · TLS 730ms
Singapore - Singapore
1561ms
DNS 606ms · TLS 643ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1170ms
DNS 516ms · TLS 222ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 874ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3

Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
Warning: 4

8 third-party resources (98% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 3.0s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€630 investment → €5,379/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€630
7.0 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€5,379
€64,553/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+10147% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6300.1 mo payback · +10147% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.

Barriers
7
7 warn
Bounce delta
+21pp
added vs baseline
Score
79
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 3.0s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 541ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€630 7.0 developer hours at €90/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€10,046,214 / month at risk ~€120,554,563 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120,500,000

ePrivacy DirectiveDSGVOEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 2 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    DSGVO: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • 2 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 2 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No headings found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€4,547 /mo

+20.7pp bounce · ~2,067 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.03 /mo

428.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~43 KB per page load
    Saves €0.03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.87 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.04 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.04 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

687 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

761 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

687 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

761 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 80.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98SEO P4Performance P96Accessibility P96Sustainability P93Content P31Infrastructure P61

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Debian · 14 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 92% of Debian sites See full Debian benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.3, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

8 technologies detected 3 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.3 Debian Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS jQuery 3.7.1
Server
Apache 2.4.66
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.66

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.4.66 (Debian)

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://res.auftrab.app/static/bootstrap/js/bootstrap.min.js, Stylesheet: https://res.auftrab.app/static/bootstrap/css/bootstrap.min.css
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Debian is a Linux software which is a free open-source software.

Categories Operating systems Website https://debian.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=u09F8GfgK2thVLD9ODvl-9cueicQR97_gQmjuvPudbA

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.7.1.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (3)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.66'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauftrab.app)](https://beavercheck.com/results/00f602c2-649f-4343-9512-78be41d5a5be)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/00f602c2-649f-4343-9512-78be41d5a5be"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauftrab.app" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fauftrab.app

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · 4 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
  • · 8 third-party resources (98% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback