Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 952ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (114ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1563ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 8.9 MB (8.0 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
1 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
IDR 3,375,000 investment → IDR 15,417,605/month returns + IDR 60,000,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 15.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 12.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Layout shifts during page loadContent movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields→ Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
IDR 60,000,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedUU PDP: IDR 1,000,000,000 – IDR 60,000,000,000
- Privacy Policy not detectedUU PDP: IDR 1,000,000,000 – IDR 60,000,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
IDR 15,385,040 /mo
+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo
CPC: IDR 5000.00
Bandwidth Waste
IDR 32,566 /mo
25238.6 MB/mo × 1290.323 IDR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.5 MB per page loadSaves IDR 32,566/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.67 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
14.97 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
144 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.211
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.02 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
19.89 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
782 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.10 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.004
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.32 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.10 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 8.9 MB (8.0 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 link(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 77+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap 5.3.3, with cdnjs CDN
Stack Architecture
Bootstrap 5.3.3
HTTP/3 
LottieFiles 
Lucide 
Priority Hints 
Swiper 
Tailwind CSS 
jQuery 3.6.0
shadcn/ui 
toastr 2.1.3All Detected Technologies (11)
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
LottieFiles is an open-source animation file format that's tiny, high quality, interactive, and can be manipulated at runtime.
Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.
toastr is a Javascript library for non-blocking notifications. The goal is to create a simple core library that can be customized and extended.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/01491b00-3c85-4dc2-b3f7-befb2209e1f1)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/01491b00-3c85-4dc2-b3f7-befb2209e1f1"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsaldoxpres.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsaldoxpres.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (78)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 8.9 MB (8.0 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found