Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
98
TTFB stable →
252ms
FCP stable →
1.3s
LCP stable →
1.4s
Scanned
2026-11-04 07:54 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
33.00s
Vs prev
no change

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

coduf.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 2

11 third-party resources (58% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

External script from www.googletagmanager.com lacks integrity attribute

External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.

Security › Subresource Integrity
Warning: 5

No DMARC record found

Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.

Security › Email Security
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₺4,125 investment → ₺4,996/month returns + TRY 10,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
₺4.125
2.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₺4.996
₺59.948/yr
Payback
0.8 mo
+1353% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided TRY 10.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₺2.625 → 0.5 mo payback · +2184% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₺1.125 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~6%.

Barriers
2
2 warn
Bounce delta
+6pp
added vs baseline
Score
94
A
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
0
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₺4,125 2.8 developer hours at ₺1500/hr
Quick wins
₺1,125 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

₺ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₺4.996 / month at risk ~₺59.948 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

TRY 10.000.000

KVKK
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    KVKK: TRY 50.000 – TRY 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    KVKK: TRY 50.000 – TRY 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    KVKK: TRY 50.000 – TRY 10.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

₺4.993 /mo

+6.2pp bounce · ~624 lost visitors/mo

CPC: TRY 8.00

Bandwidth Waste

₺2,62 /mo

1016.1 MB/mo × 2.581 TRY/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~102 KB per page load
    Saves ₺2,62/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.29 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

166 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.29 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.39 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

514 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

554 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

514 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

559 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 85.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Application Request Routing · 8 peers
You 86
·
Avg 86
At average
0 50 100
Open Graph · 4938 peers
You 86
·
Avg 77
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Accessibility P88Performance P87Security P86Content P84Infrastructure P23Sustainability P66SEO P48

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Application Request Routing 3.0, on IIS

9 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Application Request Routing 3.0 Open Graph Priority Hints React React Router 7.18.4 Windows Server
Server
IIS

All Detected Technologies (9)

Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.

Categories Web servers Website https://www.iis.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Application Request Routing (ARR) is an extension to Internet Information Server (IIS), which enables an IIS server to function as a load balancer.

Categories Load balancers Website https://www.iis.net/downloads/microsoft/application-request-routing Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.

Categories Operating systems Website https://microsoft.com/windowsserver Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-746NB401PH

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Application Request Routing) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoduf.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/coduf.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/coduf.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoduf.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcoduf.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 11 third-party resources (58% of weight)
  • · External script from www.googletagmanager.com lacks integrity attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → A (91)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · No DMARC record found

Send Feedback