Audit overview
Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Page weighs 8.8 MB (12.4 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
4 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
8 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,105 investment → €9,145/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 4.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 2.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 5 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Viewport disables user zoomVisitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk→ Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
- Thin contentUnder 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first→ Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.219 /mo
+28.3pp bounce · ~2,827 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€2,89 /mo
39078.6 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~3.9 MB per page loadSaves €2,89/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.33 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.75 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
34 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.75 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.75 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
774 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.01 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.25 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.01 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 8.8 MB (12.4 MB transferred)
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
4 button(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
WordPress, on PHP, with Netlify CDN
Stack Architecture
Linkedin Ads Linkedin Insight Tag 
Plausible 
Yoast SEO 
WordPress 
Adobe Fonts 
Algolia 4.26.0
Alpine.js 3.15.8
GSAP Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft 
MySQL 
Open Graph Plausible Analytics 
Tailwind CSS Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) 
PHP 
Netlify Netlify CDN jsDelivr CDN All Detected Technologies (22)
Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.
Algolia offers a hosted web search product delivering real-time results.
Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.
GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Twitter Emoji is a set of open-source emoticons and emojis for Twitter, TweetDeck, and also for Android and iOS versions of the application.
Linkedin Ads is a paid marketing tool that offers access to Linkedin social networks through various sponsored posts and other methods.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Plausible is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics.
Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.
Observations (3)
WordPress detected — review security configuration
WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Fonts) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
22 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/05aec321-b903-4a6e-9ae3-83a71464c950)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/05aec321-b903-4a6e-9ae3-83a71464c950"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fa16z.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fa16z.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (87)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 8.8 MB (12.4 MB transferred)
- · 4 button(s) with no accessible text
- · 8 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+5Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source