Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
55
TTFB stable →
1.2s
FCP stable →
3.4s
LCP stable →
4.9s
Scanned
2026-09-26 23:36 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
2.8m
Vs prev
Declined by -2

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 696ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (57ms), slowest from Santa Clara (1249ms). No CDN (document or assets). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
1249ms
DNS 621ms · TLS 159ms
Spain - Madrid
57ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 4ms
United Stated - New York
370ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 89ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
214ms
DNS 77ms · TLS 38ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1234ms
DNS 395ms · TLS 213ms
Singapore - Singapore
1053ms
DNS 427ms · TLS 159ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 696ms · Cache: max-age=3600

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

espiralturismoinductivo.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

5 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

1 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 5

1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WordPress 7.0.6

Each disclosed version enables direct CVE lookup -- attacker reads the version, searches the CVE database, targets the site with a tested exploit.

Security › HTML Version Disclosure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€261 investment → €10,109/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€261
4.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€10.109
€121.308/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+46334% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€234 → 0.0 mo payback · +51797% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€41 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
8
3 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
55
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 5 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • 16 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 314ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€261 4.8 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€41 3 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.215 / month at risk ~€86.575 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 5 control(s) without accessible label
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.214 /mo

+32.8pp bounce · ~3,279 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,26 /mo

3523.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~352 KB per page load
    Saves €0,26/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

55
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.42 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.95 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

314 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.218

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.62 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.77 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.60 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.47 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

15 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.044

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.15 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.47 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 1010 peers
You 83
·
Avg 76
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P97Compliance P17Sustainability P81Infrastructure P21Performance P79Security P70SEO P69Content P37

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 86% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
AddToAny · 43 peers
You 83
·
Avg 74
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 93% of AddToAny sites See full AddToAny benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress 7.0.6, on PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

14 technologies detected 5 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Polylang RankMath SEO
CMS
WordPress 7.0.6
Framework
AddToAny Bulma MySQL Open Graph Priority Hints RSS Twitter Emoji (Twemoji) jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery Migrate 3.4.1
Runtime
PHP
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (14)

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://espiralturismoinductivo.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/addtoany.min.js?ver=1.1, Script URL: https://espiralturismoinductivo.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1, Link URL: https://espiralturismoinductivo.com/wp-content/themes/twentytwentytwo/style.css?ver=7.0.6
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AddToAny is a universal sharing platform that can be integrated into a website by use of a web widget or plugin.

Categories Widgets Website https://www.addtoany.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 25 Bulma class patterns in HTML

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Twitter Emoji is a set of open-source emoticons and emojis for Twitter, TweetDeck, and also for Android and iOS versions of the application.

Categories Font scripts Website https://twitter.github.io/twemoji/ Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://espiralturismoinductivo.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.7.1, Script URL: https://espiralturismoinductivo.com/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=3.4.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

Polylang is a WordPress plugin which allows you to create multilingual WordPress site.

Categories WordPress plugins, Translation Website https://wordpress.org/plugins/polylang Detected by BeaverCheck

RankMath SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress.

Categories WordPress plugins, SEO Website https://rankmath.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (AddToAny) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fespiralturismoinductivo.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/espiralturismoinductivo.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/espiralturismoinductivo.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fespiralturismoinductivo.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fespiralturismoinductivo.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
  • · 1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WordPress 7.0.6

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · 5 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback