Skip to content
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:29 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.6m
Vs prev

Audit overview

6 categories need attention: Performance, and 5 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 12.2 MB (4.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

13 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 13.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.1s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽25,375 investment → ₽303,150/month returns

Investment
₽25 375
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₽303 150
₽3 637 801/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14236% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽21 8750.1 mo payback · +16530% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽875 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

12 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~43%.

Barriers
12
6 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+43pp
added vs baseline
Score
22
F
Speed
2
Trust
3
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Page takes 13.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 846ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 13 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽25,375 7.3 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽875 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽258 123 / month at risk ~₽3 097 474 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽258 023 /mo

+43.0pp bounce · ~4,300 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽100 /mo

13690.8 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page load
    Saves ₽100/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

41
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
63
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
85
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.17 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.09 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

846 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.024

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

22.52 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
63
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
88
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.44 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.057

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.27 s

Categories

8
Avg score 65.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AMP · 37 peers
You 64
·
Avg 71
-7 below average
0 50 100
core-js · 1582 peers
You 64
·
Avg 72
-8 below average
0 50 100
Performance P1Compliance P1Accessibility P2Content P2SEO P11Security P26Sustainability P40Infrastructure P41

Top 10% of core-js sites score 81+ on Performance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Technology stack

AMP, with Nginx CDN

13 technologies detected 3 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
ADFOX AdRiver Google AdSense Google Tag Manager Yandex.Metrika
Framework
AMP Moment.js 2.29.1 Prototype 1.6.0.2 Viqeo YouTube core-js 3.34.0 script.aculo.us 1.8.1
CDN
Nginx 1.14.2

All Detected Technologies (13)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.14.2
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AMP, originally created by Google, is an open-source HTML framework developed by the AMP open-source Project. AMP is designed to help webpages load faster.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://www.amp.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://momentjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Prototype is a JavaScript Framework that aims to ease development of web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://www.prototypejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Viqeo is a short video platform to make media and ecommerce more visual and interesting.

Categories Video players Website https://viqeo.tv Detected by BeaverCheck

YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.

Categories Video players Website https://www.youtube.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://script.aculo.us Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

ADFOX is an advertising management platform for media publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://adfox.yandex.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

AdRiver is a company which provide internet advertising management and audit software.

Categories Advertising Website https://adriver.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

Google AdSense is a program run by Google through which website publishers serve advertisements that are targeted to the site content and audience.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.google.com/adsense/start/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Yandex.Metrica is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://metrika.yandex.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AMP) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fliveinternet.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/064cccc9-0710-499c-8947-b613d7c0fa39)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/064cccc9-0710-499c-8947-b613d7c0fa39"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fliveinternet.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fliveinternet.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (74)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → D (69)
  • · Page weighs 12.2 MB (4.4 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → C (74)
  • · 13 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback