Skip to content
GB · GBP (£) · Estimated Applicable regulations: UK GDPR · PECR · Equality Act 2010 Dev cost: £75/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-15 23:12 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
38.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 17.5 MB (9.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 4.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£481 investment → £11,418/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided

Investment
£481
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£11,418
£137,012/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+28370% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 18,050,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.0 mo payback · +29129% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£31 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~41%.

Barriers
11
4 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+41pp
added vs baseline
Score
39
F
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.0s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£481 6.4 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£31 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£8,519 / month at risk ~£102,224 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£18,050,000

UK GDPRPECREquality Act 2010
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£8,517 /mo

+40.6pp bounce · ~4,056 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£1.86 /mo

29504.3 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.0 MB per page load
    Saves £1.86/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

22
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.98 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.93 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.96 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.729

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.20 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

35.30 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
74
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
80
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

463 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

500 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

499 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

500 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 68.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1011 peers
You 70
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P3SEO P8Content P9Security P89Infrastructure P13Sustainability P19Performance P21Accessibility P45

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 14% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Apple · 1276 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Content P8Sustainability P12SEO P13Security P86Infrastructure P17Performance P18Accessibility P35

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 12% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN

10 technologies detected 3 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon Route 53 Apple Google Search Console Google Workspace Microsoft
CDN
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront Amazon S3
Hosting
AWS Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (10)

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-amz-cf-id: KD8x9AeT8BS_ov3spi7QF9HMoB7t9NziovMkI4T-txYPF9A0fOl7ng==

Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Hosting Website https://aws.amazon.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Header: X-Amz-Cf-Id

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-654.awsdns-17.net
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=e9WiroqCcOpsd3Gi
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=seEXglnGTvHqVcJ0lNMUHHRSVLxQFdQ5fbCBH42tdcg
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms27293801

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftelegraph.co.uk)](https://beavercheck.com/results/0707b0c7-8515-484e-a81a-ac30ef086712)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/0707b0c7-8515-484e-a81a-ac30ef086712"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftelegraph.co.uk" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftelegraph.co.uk

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (76)
  • · Page weighs 17.5 MB (9.4 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback