Netherlands · Amsterdam Completed: Apr 23, 2026 09:48 UTCYour site declined by 6 points
Compared to scan from 18 days ago
Mobile 375 × 812
Desktop 1440 × 900
Score: 71 / 100 6
Based on 6 categories, 44 sections
Good foundation, but a few gaps could be exploited.
Major barriers for users with disabilities — up to 15% of your audience.
Solid SEO basics — a few optimizations could boost rankings.
Solid infrastructure — fast server responses across the board.
Mostly compliant — a few items need attention.
Content issues affect how your site appears when shared and indexed.
The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.
Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
1 control(s) without accessible label
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
1 image-in-link without alt text
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
2 image(s) missing alt attribute
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
31 link(s) with no accessible text
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
High impact, low effort — start here.
High impact, requires investment.
Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/0766e06b-0dcc-40db-894e-10ec0929eeee)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/0766e06b-0dcc-40db-894e-10ec0929eeee"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.comThis badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.
No HSTS header
+1% bounceReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
Fix: Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
No Content-Security-Policy header
+1% bounceHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
1 form field(s) without a label
+2% bounceScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
Fix: Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
No Open Graph tags
+2% bounceLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
Fix: Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
No structured data
+2% bounceNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
Fix: Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
32 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
+1% bounceScreen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
Fix: Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
No skip-to-content link
+1% bounceKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
Fix: Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
105 broken link(s) on the page
+5% bounceClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
Fix: Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
€553 investment → €0.00/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided
€553
6h · 5 findings
€0.00 /mo
~€0.00 / year
EUR 20,500,000
if kept compliant
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
6.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Based on European Union rates (€85/hr)
Start here for the best return on investment
€1,708,333 / month at risk
~€20,500,000 / year if left unfixed
€20,500,000
+6 more
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Thanks for your feedback!
We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.
Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.
Key metrics that affect user experience.
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
857 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
934 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
27 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.37 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
934 ms
Desktop audit not available for this result.
Send Feedback