Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
34
TTFB stable →
228ms
FCP stable →
3.5s
LCP stable →
16.0s
Scanned
2026-08-25 10:48 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 548ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (221ms), slowest from Singapore (994ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
230ms
DNS 92ms · TLS 50ms
United Stated - New York
221ms
DNS 86ms · TLS 51ms
Spain - Madrid
516ms
DNS 143ms · TLS 127ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
720ms
DNS 291ms · TLS 148ms
Singapore - Singapore
994ms
DNS 401ms · TLS 202ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
606ms
DNS 234ms · TLS 130ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 548ms · Cache: max-age=7200

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

mrpov.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 25.6 MB (24.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

2 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 16.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 16.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$725 investment → $8,827/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$725
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,827
$105,926/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14511% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +16848% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 16.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 13.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.9s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 9 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$725 7.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,827 / month at risk ~$105,926 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • 5 of 5 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 2 control(s) without accessible label
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,821 /mo

+32.8pp bounce · ~3,279 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$6.06 /mo

75698.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~7.6 MB per page load
    Saves $6.06/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

33
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.57 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

15.99 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.90 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.59 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

15.99 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

771 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.57 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

333 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.77 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.49 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 1009 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P9Accessibility P90Sustainability P13Security P82Content P22Compliance P28SEO P34Performance P44

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 74% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4126 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P7Accessibility P91Sustainability P13Security P82Content P30Compliance P33Performance P52SEO P49

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 4.6.1, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

16 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Matomo Analytics
Framework
Bootstrap 4.6.1Google Search Console Hotjar Isotope Masonry Modernizr 3.11.3 Open Graph Plyr Swiper Tailwind CSS jQuery 3.6.0
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2

All Detected Technologies (16)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 7 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=ZTPT0-ORta9_4fNL4GD0PET2iQCxcIVHFAGWkx3t1WY
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains static.hotjar.com: https://static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-1740121.js?sv=6

Isotope.js is a JavaScript library that makes it easy to sort, filter, and add Masonry layouts to items on a webpage.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://isotope.metafizzy.co Detected by BeaverCheck

Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://masonry.desandro.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Plyr is a simple, lightweight, accessible and customizable HTML5, YouTube and Vimeo media player that supports modern browsers.

Categories Video players Website https://plyr.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 25 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google-analytics.com: https://www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=UA-1815564-21&cx=c&gtm=4e68l1

Matomo Analytics is a free and open-source web analytics application, that runs on a PHP/MySQL web-server.

Categories Analytics Website https://matomo.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 4.6.1. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmrpov.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/mrpov.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/mrpov.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmrpov.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmrpov.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (83)
  • · Page weighs 25.6 MB (24.1 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (87)
  • · 2 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback