URL substituted: You submitted https://alberta.ca but we scanned https://www.alberta.ca instead — the HTTPS certificate on the submitted hostname didn't cover that name, so we retried on the www. variant
Brazil · Sao Paulo Completed: Apr 21, 2026 22:56 UTCMobile 375 × 812
Desktop 1440 × 900
Score: 76 / 100
Based on 6 categories, 44 sections
Several missing protections leave your users and data exposed.
Mostly accessible, but some users still face barriers.
Well-optimized for search — your content is discoverable.
Solid infrastructure — fast server responses across the board.
Mostly compliant — a few items need attention.
Rich content metadata — your pages look great everywhere.
The overall score is a weighted average of individual category scores. Categories with more impact on user experience and security carry more weight.
Weights reflect general web best practices. Individual needs may differ.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
1 button(s) with no accessible text
Accessibility issues exclude users with disabilities — up to 15% of your potential audience.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.
High impact, low effort — start here.
High impact, requires investment.
Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/08fe6092-7ff6-4138-8d73-5abad005fba0)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/08fe6092-7ff6-4138-8d73-5abad005fba0"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Falberta.ca" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Falberta.caThis badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.
Page takes 16.9s to load
+12% bounceUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 14.4s over the 2.5s threshold
Fix: Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
Page feels frozen for 1.6s
+5% bounceClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
Fix: Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
No Content-Security-Policy header
+1% bounceHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
Fix: Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Content is hard to read
+2% bounceGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
Fix: Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
2 broken link(s) on the page
+3% bounceClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
Fix: Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
CAD 333 investment → CAD 0.00/month returns + CAD 350,000 risk avoided
CAD 333
4h · 5 findings
CAD 0.00 /mo
~CAD 0.00 / year
CAD 350,000
if kept compliant
CAD 190 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
3.5 developer hours at CA$95/hr
Based on Canada rates (CA$95/hr)
Start here for the best return on investment
CAD 29,167 / month at risk
~CAD 350,000 / year if left unfixed
CAD 350,000
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Thanks for your feedback!
We'll use a cached audit if available, or offer to scan.
Industry-standard audits powered by Google Lighthouse.
Key metrics that affect user experience.
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.03 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
16.85 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.58 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.52 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
17.03 s
Desktop audit not available for this result.
Send Feedback