Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-09 02:33 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 900ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (79ms), slowest from Singapore (3691ms). Assets on Cloudflare (host unpkg.com, 3 assets); document served directly from origin. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
258ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 59ms
United Stated - New York
79ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 21ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
328ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 103ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
525ms
DNS 141ms · TLS 130ms
Spain - Madrid
523ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 126ms
Singapore - Singapore
3691ms
DNS 3012ms · TLS 230ms
CDN: Cloudflare (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 900ms · Cache: max-age=3600

Audit overview

Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

wikiauthoritygroup.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 10.9 MB (4.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 25.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 25.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$525 investment → $8,718/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$525
5.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,718
$104,618/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19827% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$500 → 0.1 mo payback · +20824% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 25.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 23.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$525 5.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,718 / month at risk ~$104,618 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,717 /mo

+32.4pp bounce · ~3,241 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.03 /mo

12883.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves $1.03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

17
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.96 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

25.46 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.58 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.210

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.96 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

25.47 s

Desktop

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.22 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.19 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.041

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.77 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.59 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1404 peers
You 81
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Security P97Compliance P14Sustainability P25Content P30Accessibility P70Performance P61SEO P41Infrastructure P45

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 3294 peers
You 81
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P14Security P82Sustainability P20Accessibility P67Infrastructure P36Content P36Performance P55SEO P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 71% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, on LiteSpeed, with unpkg CDN

14 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight Google Ads Google Ads Conversion Tracking Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Tawk.to
Framework
Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph React 18.3.1 Web3Forms
Server
LiteSpeed
CDN
unpkg

All Detected Technologies (14)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains unpkg.com: https://unpkg.com/react@18.3.1/umd/react.development.js

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: LiteSpeed
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://unpkg.com/react-dom@18.3.1/umd/react-dom.development.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Web3Forms is a contact form to email service utilising the Web3 API.

Categories Form builders Website https://web3forms.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Advertising Website https://support.google.com/ds/answer/6029713?hl=en Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.

Categories Advertising Website https://ads.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.

Categories Analytics Website https://support.google.com/google-ads/answer/1722022 Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=AW-18180188299

Tawk.to is a free messaging app to monitor and chat with the visitors to a website, mobile app.

Categories Live chat Website https://tawk.to Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains embed.tawk.to: https://embed.tawk.to/69eaf3f623ab1b1c3283ebee/1jmushvan

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwikiauthoritygroup.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/wikiauthoritygroup.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/wikiauthoritygroup.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwikiauthoritygroup.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwikiauthoritygroup.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · Page weighs 10.9 MB (4.1 MB transferred)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 5h → B (88)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback