Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-26 11:38 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
32.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 552ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (36ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1064ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
145ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 30ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
36ms
DNS 20ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
447ms
DNS 206ms · TLS 85ms
United States - Santa Clara
739ms
DNS 293ms · TLS 149ms
Singapore - Singapore
882ms
DNS 335ms · TLS 186ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1064ms
DNS 499ms · TLS 194ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 552ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

sauna.equipment fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

3 third-party resources (78% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$675 investment → $2,191/month returns + USD 7,500 risk avoided

Investment
$675
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$2,191
$26,288/yr
Payback
0.3 mo
+3794% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 7,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.3 mo payback · +4106% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

3 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~8%.

Barriers
3
3 warn
Bounce delta
+8pp
added vs baseline
Score
91
A
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$675 6.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$2,191 / month at risk ~$26,288 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$7,500

CCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$2,191 /mo

+8.1pp bounce · ~814 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.02 /mo

275.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~28 KB per page load
    Saves $0.02/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.83 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.83 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.015

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.83 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.83 s

Desktop

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

876 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

876 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

876 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

876 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 85.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1163 peers
You 85
·
Avg 74
+11 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Accessibility P97Performance P96Sustainability P87Security P85Content P85SEO P68Infrastructure P51

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
Open Graph · 3840 peers
You 85
·
Avg 75
+10 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Performance P92Accessibility P91Sustainability P84Security P81Content P75SEO P65Infrastructure P52

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Nginx CDN

3 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Font API Open Graph
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (3)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcedar.sauna.equipment%2Fheadrest%2F)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/sauna.equipment)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/sauna.equipment"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcedar.sauna.equipment%2Fheadrest%2F" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcedar.sauna.equipment%2Fheadrest%2F

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (93)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → A (90)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 3 third-party resources (78% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (93)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback