Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:03 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 335ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (65ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (697ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
177ms
DNS 39ms · TLS 26ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
65ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
269ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 12ms
United States - Santa Clara
396ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 10ms
Singapore - Singapore
407ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 17ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
697ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 7ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 335ms · Cache: public, max-age=0

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page body has only 24 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£519 investment → £5,981/month returns + GBP 17,550,000 risk avoided

Investment
£519
6.9 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
£5,981
£71,767/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+13735% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 17,550,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.1 mo payback · +15210% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£69 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers
8
8 warn
Bounce delta
+22pp
added vs baseline
Score
76
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 3.5s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 978ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 304ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£519 6.9 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£69 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

£1,467,042 / month at risk ~£17,604,507 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£17,550,000

UK GDPREquality Act 2010
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No headings found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£4,542 /mo

+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.09 /mo

1375.7 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~138 KB per page load
    Saves £0.09/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

78
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

304 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.85 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

946 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.08 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

946 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.08 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Accessibility P93Security P89Performance P84SEO P32Infrastructure P36Sustainability P64Content P37

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →
React · 977 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P96Accessibility P96Security P93Sustainability P90Content P11SEO P14Infrastructure P56

Top 10% of React sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of React sites See full React benchmark →

Technology stack

HTTP/3, on Node.js, hosted on Express, with Cloudflare CDN

7 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
HTTP/3 React React Router 6 Tailwind CSS
Runtime
Node.js
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Express

All Detected Technologies (7)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.

Categories Web frameworks, Web servers Website https://expressjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment that executes JavaScript code outside a web browser.

Categories Programming languages Website https://nodejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 11 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HTTP/3) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FTransport.bluei.io)](https://beavercheck.com/results/09e1b13d-723b-49fb-b18e-c4f9e32e511f)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/09e1b13d-723b-49fb-b18e-c4f9e32e511f"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FTransport.bluei.io" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FTransport.bluei.io

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 24 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback