Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 831ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (318ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1306ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Accessibility and Compliance need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
1 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
12 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€399 investment → €9,555/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.
- Page takes 12.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 10.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 7 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- 6 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 277ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€7.575 /mo
+34.4pp bounce · ~3,443 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,61 /mo
8246.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~825 KB per page loadSaves €0,61/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.68 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
12.74 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
277 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.085
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.52 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
12.99 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.10 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.97 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.092
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.44 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.97 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
1 image-in-link without alt text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of jQuery sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Font API, on IIS/ASP.NET, hosted on Microsoft IIS
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Google Font API 
Microsoft ASP.NET 
Open Graph 
Plesk 
Windows Server 
jQuery 1.6.2 ASP.NET 
IIS 10.0 Microsoft IIS 10.0All Detected Technologies (11)
Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Plesk is a web hosting and server data centre automation software with a control panel developed for Linux and Windows-based retail hosting service providers.
Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (4)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 1.6.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/provincialatina.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/provincialatina.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprovincialatina.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprovincialatina.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (85)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · 1 image-in-link without alt text
- · 12 link(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+4Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found