Skip to content
https://ogm.uk.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-05-10 13:48 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
2.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 764ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (238ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1126ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
238ms
DNS 19ms · TLS 19ms
Spain - Madrid
345ms
DNS 51ms · TLS 35ms
United States - Santa Clara
1072ms
DNS 311ms · TLS 141ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1126ms
DNS 377ms · TLS 190ms
United Stated - New York
811ms
DNS 246ms · TLS 85ms
Singapore - Singapore
990ms
DNS 339ms · TLS 165ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 764ms · Cache: max-age=0

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 26.6 MB (20.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 17.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 17.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£544 investment → £3,323/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£544
7.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£3,323
£39,873/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7233% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4690.1 mo payback · +8406% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£19 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
8
3 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
55
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 17.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 4.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 9 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£544 7.3 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£19 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

£7,489 / month at risk ~£89,873 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • No <main> landmark found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • 4 of 8 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • No H1 heading found
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H6 (missing H3)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£3,319 /mo

+31.6pp bounce · ~3,161 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 1.05

Bandwidth Waste

£4.14 /mo

65738.2 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~6.6 MB per page load
    Saves £4.14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

22
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.75 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.60 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

4.58 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.108

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

11.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.96 s

Desktop

48
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

981 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

538 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.069

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.92 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.11 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WooCommerce · 105 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Better than 86% of WooCommerce sites See full WooCommerce benchmark →
Elementor · 47 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Better than 85% of Elementor sites See full Elementor benchmark →

Technology stack

Elementor 4.0.4, on PHP, with Nginx CDN

23 technologies detected 6 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Draftpress HFCM Google Analytics Google Tag Manager HubSpot HubSpot Analytics HubSpot Chat Linkedin Insight Tag Site Kit 1.178.0 WP Rocket 3.20.3
Ecommerce
WooCommerce
CMS
Elementor 4.0.4 WordPress 6.9.4
Framework
Google Search Console Hotjar Microsoft Microsoft 365 MySQL Plesk Slider Revolution 5.4.6.2 jQuery reCAPTCHA
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (23)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Elementor is a website builder platform for professionals on WordPress.

Categories Page builders, WordPress plugins Website https://elementor.com Detected by BeaverCheck

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Link URL: https://ogm.uk.com/wp-content/themes/astra/assets/css/minified/main.min.css?ver=4.13.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Ecommerce Website https://woocommerce.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Body: woocommerce class/marker present
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=5ONnWLiuffbVP1aRBEXfjSc3pDXVxBoo6TojFfxxoYk
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains static.hotjar.com: //static.hotjar.com/c/hotjar-2792281.js?sv=5
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms56567839
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 ip4:109.74.248.20 a:remote.ogm.uk.com include:spf.vsl-net.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Plesk is a web hosting and server data centre automation software with a control panel developed for Linux and Windows-based retail hosting service providers.

Categories Hosting panels Website https://www.plesk.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Slider Revolution is a flexible and highly customisable slider.

Categories Widgets, Photo galleries Website https://www.sliderrevolution.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Security Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.google.com/recaptcha: https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?render=6LcVdi0aAAAAACPSF6mWxlLo87O6eS2GmMHQkNOV&ver=3.0

Header Footer Code Manager by Draftpress is a easy interface to add snippets to the header or footer or above or below the content of your page.

Categories WordPress plugins Website https://draftpress.com/products/header-footer-code-manager-pro/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-MBL4T29

HubSpot is a marketing and sales software that helps companies attract visitors, convert leads, and close customers.

Categories Marketing automation Website https://www.hubspot.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains js.hs-scripts.com: https://js.hs-scripts.com/20263761.js?integration=WordPress&ver=11.3.45

HubSpot is a marketing and sales software that helps companies attract visitors, convert leads, and close customers.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.hubspot.com/products/marketing/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

HubSpot Chat is a tool where you can view, manage, and reply to incoming messages from multiple channels.

Categories Live chat Website https://www.hubspot.com/products/crm/live-chat Detected by BeaverCheck

LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.

Categories Analytics Website https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/insight-tag Detected by BeaverCheck

Site Kit is a one-stop solution for WordPress users to use everything Google has to offer to make them successful on the web.

Categories Analytics, WordPress plugins Website https://sitekit.withgoogle.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

WP Rocket is a caching and performance optimisation plugin to improve the loading speed of WordPress websites.

Categories Caching, WordPress plugins Website https://wp-rocket.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

23 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fogm.uk.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/0d67ef5e-20ab-4064-9d4e-dd3f510de6fa)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/0d67ef5e-20ab-4064-9d4e-dd3f510de6fa"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fogm.uk.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fogm.uk.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · Page weighs 26.6 MB (20.9 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → A (90)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback