Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-23 15:39 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
52.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1130ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (255ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1757ms). Document on Netlify; assets also on imgix. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1374ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 135ms
United Stated - New York
255ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 36ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1405ms
DNS 27ms · TLS 128ms
United States - Santa Clara
1134ms
DNS 21ms · TLS 70ms
Singapore - Singapore
853ms
DNS 178ms · TLS 218ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1757ms
DNS 355ms · TLS 142ms
CDN: Netlify ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 1130ms · Cache: public,max-age=0,must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

globalmaritimecontainers.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 5.8 MB (4.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

4 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

46 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.4s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$500 investment → $10,938/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$500
5.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$10,938
$131,256/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+26151% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$450 → 0.0 mo payback · +29068% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
8
4 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
48
D
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 46 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$500 5.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,263 / month at risk ~$111,152 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,262 /mo

+34.4pp bounce · ~3,443 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.05 /mo

13152.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves $1.05/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

32
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.94 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.40 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.43 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.102

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.49 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

950 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.89 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

131 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.22 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.00 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1455 peers
You 80
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
SEO P89Compliance P14Content P78Infrastructure P70Security P67Accessibility P62Performance P58Sustainability P48

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 72% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 3340 peers
You 80
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P14SEO P86Content P71Infrastructure P66Security P61Accessibility P61Sustainability P41Performance P52

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 65% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Netlify CDN

12 technologies detected 3 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Google Font API HSTS Lenis 1.3.26 Lucide Netlify Forms Open Graph Priority Hints Tailwind CSS
CDN
Netlify Netlify CDN

All Detected Technologies (12)

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M5MPKQJ0SN7CGXESPAHV628H

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lenis is a smooth scroll library to normalise the scrolling experience across devices.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website http://lenis.darkroom.engineering Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Netlify Forms is a serverless form handling solution for static websites.

Categories Form builders Website https://www.netlify.com/products/forms Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 444 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-HTMY2S5EPQ

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalmaritimecontainers.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/globalmaritimecontainers.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/globalmaritimecontainers.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalmaritimecontainers.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.globalmaritimecontainers.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · Page weighs 5.8 MB (4.2 MB transferred)
  • · 4 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (89)
  • · 46 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback