Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
promodog.pl fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
108 third-party resources (49% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
157 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
2 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: Clipper 2.0.11, Site Kit by Google 1.191.0
Each disclosed version enables direct CVE lookup -- attacker reads the version, searches the CVE database, targets the site with a tested exploit.
26 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
PLN 1,125 investment → PLN 20,219/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 6.3s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 3.8s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 790msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 118 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€500.000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
PLN 14 491 /mo
+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo
CPC: PLN 5.00
Bandwidth Waste
PLN 1,93 /mo
6030.0 MB/mo × 0.320 PLN/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~603 KB per page loadSaves PLN 1,93/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.79 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.29 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
790 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.060
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
12.55 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
15.34 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.04 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.38 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
17 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.013
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.62 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.17 s
Categories
8Performance
108 third-party resources (49% of weight)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on Infrastructure; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
WordPress, on LiteSpeed/PHP, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Litespeed Cache 
Site Kit 1.191.0
WordPress 
Font Awesome 
Google Font API HSTS 
HTTP/3 
MySQL 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
RSS 
PHP 
LiteSpeed 
Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (14)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
LiteSpeed Cache is an all-in-one site acceleration plugin for WordPress.
Site Kit is a one-stop solution for WordPress users to use everything Google has to offer to make them successful on the web.
Observations (3)
WordPress detected — review security configuration
WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.
No build tool detected
A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/promodog.pl)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/promodog.pl"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpromodog.pl" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpromodog.plExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 108 third-party resources (49% of weight)
- · 2 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: Clipper 2.0.11, Site Kit by Google 1.191.0
- · 26 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · 157 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing