Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-16 18:07 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Performance and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Page weighs 8.5 MB (4.3 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 2

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 3

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

1 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

4 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 7.4s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
Your LCP is 7.4s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€298 investment → €10,884/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€298
3.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€10.884
€130.610/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+43802% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2550.0 mo payback · +51120% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€85 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 7.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 3.8s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€298 3.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€85 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.325 / month at risk ~€75.906 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 2 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H5 (missing H2)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 empty heading(s)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.324 /mo

+28.7pp bounce · ~2,875 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,99 /mo

13390.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.3 MB per page load
    Saves €0,99/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

37
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.66 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.40 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3.76 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.19 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

21.30 s

Desktop

61
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

984 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.01 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

584 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.100

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.70 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.11 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Apple · 1267 peers
You 74
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P84Performance P18Security P75SEO P29Infrastructure P70Content P67Sustainability P66Accessibility P35

Top 10% of Apple sites score 84+ on Performance; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 56% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →
Element UI · 14 peers
You 74
·
Avg 70
At average
0 50 100
Better than 78% of Element UI sites See full Element UI benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, with Fastly CDN

16 technologies detected 3 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Stripe basil
Framework
Apple Element UI Google Domains Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Open Graph Sentry Varnish Vue.js reCAPTCHA
CDN
Fastly Nginx

All Detected Technologies (16)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-rtm-ehrd2290042-RTM, cache-rtm-ehrd2290059-RTM

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=YnAbPC9ay7NlvPfJ

Element UI is an open-source component library specifically designed for Vue.js, offering a collection of pre-designed UI components such as buttons, forms, tables, and modals.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://element.eleme.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-cloud-d3.googledomains.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=n7VFVIsha5YafmTLSe77JvVFOMw95jU5S5BQRRL_6Qc
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

reCAPTCHA is a free service from Google that helps protect websites from spam and abuse.

Categories Security Website https://www.google.com/recaptcha/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.recaptcha.net: https://www.recaptcha.net/recaptcha/enterprise.js?render=6LeBNSocAAAAADrhkgX9-hQq4E4K1P_HVzB7IDFD

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=GT-WV86TPST&cx=c&gtm=4e64f0&bs=ctrl

Stripe offers online payment processing for internet businesses as well as fraud prevention, invoicing and subscription management.

Categories Payment processors Website https://stripe.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains js.stripe.com: https://js.stripe.com/basil/stripe.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbandcamp.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/0fcaa4d9-cb58-4f08-8240-5223a9e2b434)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/0fcaa4d9-cb58-4f08-8240-5223a9e2b434"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbandcamp.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbandcamp.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · Page weighs 8.5 MB (4.3 MB transferred)
  • · 1 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 4 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → B (81)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Send Feedback