Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
54
TTFB stable →
588ms
FCP stable →
4.2s
LCP stable →
13.4s
Scanned
2026-09-27 07:22 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.2m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1253ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (379ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (2279ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
379ms
DNS 179ms · TLS 61ms
United Stated - New York
860ms
DNS 498ms · TLS 119ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
475ms
DNS 237ms · TLS 63ms
United States - Santa Clara
1322ms
DNS 743ms · TLS 189ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
2279ms
DNS 1035ms · TLS 750ms
Singapore - Singapore
2205ms
DNS 1332ms · TLS 527ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 1253ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

immocastlepromotion.dz fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

No H1 heading found

No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.

Accessibility › Heading Hierarchy
Warning: 5

/package.json is publicly accessible

Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.

Security › Information Leakage
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

DZD 40,000 investment → DZD 1,158,150/month returns

Investment
DZD 40,000
13.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
DZD 1,158,150
DZD 13,897,797/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+34644% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
DZD 36,500 → 0.0 mo payback · +37976% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
DZD 1,000 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
  • 2 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

د.ج40,000 13.3 developer hours at د.ج3000/hr
Quick wins
د.ج1,000 2 fixes in ~20 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

د.ج /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

DZD 894,793 / month at risk ~DZD 10,737,520 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

DZD 894,708 /mo

+24.6pp bounce · ~2,461 lost visitors/mo

CPC: DZD 363.51

Bandwidth Waste

DZD 85 /mo

7854.5 MB/mo × 10.811 DZD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~785 KB per page load
    Saves DZD 85/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.52 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.16 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

57 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

17.01 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.19 s

Desktop

85
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

906 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.09 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.08 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.11 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 1059 peers
You 83
·
Avg 75
+8 above average
0 50 100
Security P95Compliance P16Performance P84Accessibility P83SEO P20Infrastructure P27Content P32Sustainability P50

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Font Awesome · 705 peers
You 83
·
Avg 75
+8 above average
0 50 100
Security P96Performance P85Accessibility P81SEO P22Compliance P23Infrastructure P26Content P33Sustainability P50

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 89 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.3, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.3 Font Awesome 6.5.2 Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Magnific Popup Priority Hints Swiper Tailwind CSS jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery UI 1.11.4
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare cdnjs

All Detected Technologies (17)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://immocastlepromotion.dz/vendor/bootstrap/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=F8gzhOqd75gJ_rxvymLLtfOq4vxNG0bOdW9s7lQn0jw

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Magnific Popup is a responsive lightbox & dialog script with focus on performance and providing best experience for user with any device.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://dimsemenov.com/plugins/magnific-popup/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 5 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://immocastlepromotion.dz/js/main/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-LT6M5ZW4Q2

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimmocastlepromotion.dz)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/immocastlepromotion.dz)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/immocastlepromotion.dz"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimmocastlepromotion.dz" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fimmocastlepromotion.dz

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 13h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No H1 heading found

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · /package.json is publicly accessible

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (90)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback