Skip to content
GR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €40/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 12:14 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.4m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 869ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (246ms), slowest from Singapore (1402ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
258ms
DNS 81ms · TLS 60ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
246ms
DNS 120ms · TLS 44ms
United Stated - New York
861ms
DNS 504ms · TLS 120ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1378ms
DNS 784ms · TLS 199ms
Singapore - Singapore
1402ms
DNS 592ms · TLS 271ms
United States - Santa Clara
1071ms
DNS 553ms · TLS 178ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 869ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

13 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

2 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€310 investment → €10,270/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€310
7.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€10,270
€123,237/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+39654% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2500.0 mo payback · +49195% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€30 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 6.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 610ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 2 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€310 7.8 developer hours at €40/hr
Quick wins
€30 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€10,048,195 / month at risk ~€120,578,339 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120,500,000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Multiple H1 headings (10 found)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 1 image(s) with filename as alt text
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 2 control(s) without accessible label
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6,528 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.48 /mo

6418.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~642 KB per page load
    Saves €0.48/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

50
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.72 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

610 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.066

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.72 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

14.37 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.019

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.16 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.87 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Elementor · 47 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 91% of Elementor sites See full Elementor benchmark →
WordPress · 755 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P97Accessibility P93Performance P84Infrastructure P17SEO P83Content P40Sustainability P52

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

Elementor 4.0.1, on LiteSpeed/PHP

13 technologies detected 5 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Litespeed Cache RankMath SEO
CMS
Elementor 4.0.1 WordPress 6.9.4
Framework
HTTP/3 MySQL Open Graph Priority Hints RSS Swiper
Runtime
PHP
Server
LiteSpeed

All Detected Technologies (13)

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: LiteSpeed
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Elementor is a website builder platform for professionals on WordPress.

Categories Page builders, WordPress plugins Website https://elementor.com Detected by BeaverCheck

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

LiteSpeed Cache is an all-in-one site acceleration plugin for WordPress.

Categories Caching, WordPress plugins Website https://wordpress.org/plugins/litespeed-cache/ Detected by BeaverCheck

RankMath SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress.

Categories WordPress plugins, SEO Website https://rankmath.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (HTTP/3) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FYellowizard.gr)](https://beavercheck.com/results/10655e28-4727-4057-86fc-942edb380d5e)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/10655e28-4727-4057-86fc-942edb380d5e"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FYellowizard.gr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FYellowizard.gr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 13 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → A (90)
  • · 2 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback