Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 20:49 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Page weighs 10.5 MB (5.5 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

4 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 32.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 32.1s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$192 investment → $8,221/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$192
1.9 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$8,221
$98,649/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+51369% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1750.0 mo payback · +56271% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$92 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 32.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 29.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.4s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$192 1.9 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$92 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,221 / month at risk ~$98,649 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,219 /mo

+30.6pp bounce · ~3,056 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.38 /mo

17209.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.7 MB per page load
    Saves $1.38/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

30
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.20 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

32.12 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.42 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.054

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

11.37 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

32.14 s

Desktop

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.42 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.99 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

160 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.45 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.00 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Drupal · 366 peers
You 71
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 13% of Drupal sites See full Drupal benchmark →
Facebook · 1417 peers
You 71
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P5Accessibility P18Sustainability P18Compliance P78SEO P58Performance P45Content P48Security P51

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 22% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Drupal 10, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server, with Cloudflare CDN

24 technologies detected 7 stack layers 8 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Anthology Encompass Google Tag Manager
CMS
Drupal 10
Framework
Facebook Font Awesome 4.7.0 Google Font API Google Search Console Microsoft Microsoft 365 OneTrust Open Graph OpenSSL 1.1.1k Popper Red Hat Tippy.js jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery UI 1.13.2
Runtime
PHP 7.2.24
Server
Apache 2.4.37
CDN
Cloudflare cdnjs jsDelivr CDN unpkg
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.37

All Detected Technologies (24)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/css-vars-ponyfill@2.0.2/dist/css-vars-ponyfill.min.js
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains unpkg.com: https://unpkg.com/popper.js@1
Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.4.37 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) OpenSSL/1.1.1k PHP/7.2.24

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.

Categories CMS Website https://www.drupal.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence robots.txt Disallow pattern: /core/, robots.txt Disallow pattern: /modules/, robots.txt Disallow pattern: /profiles/
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=3m35a8tsb2a67nl9a6wd7ayu24hb4e

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=_Skx3UdEaDozIeqzD-C9AwVx5sRr1NI8IXfyaTd6moo
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms42891787
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 ip4:129.174.7.212 include:servers.mcsv.net include:spf.protection.outlook.com ?all

OneTrust is a cloud-based data privacy management compliance platform.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.onetrust.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

OpenSSL is a software library for applications that secure communications over computer networks against eavesdropping or need to identify the party at the other end.

Categories Web server extensions Website https://openssl.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Red Hat is an open-source Linux operating system.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.redhat.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Tippy.js is the complete tooltip, popover, dropdown, and menu solution for the web, powered by Popper.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://atomiks.github.io/tippyjs Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Anthology Encompass is a constituent engagement management provider or educational institutions that provides modules to help you manage events, websites and content, data, and more.

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PX3VVD5

Observations (5)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.37'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 7.2.24'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

PHP version may be outdated

Detected PHP 7.2.24. The current major version is 8. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

24 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgmu.edu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/107825cb-c5ce-4602-bdbc-62829bddc6a7)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/107825cb-c5ce-4602-bdbc-62829bddc6a7"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgmu.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgmu.edu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+8

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · Page weighs 10.5 MB (5.5 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 4 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (80)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label

Send Feedback