Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-24 19:49 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1550ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (1078ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (2319ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1089ms
DNS 30ms · TLS 24ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1262ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 9ms
United States - Santa Clara
1668ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
1078ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
1880ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 11ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
2319ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 16ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 1550ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

fellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

4 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

Cookie 'XSRF-TOKEN' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 2.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 2.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$650 investment → $8,609/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$650
6.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$8,609
$103,312/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15794% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$425 → 0.0 mo payback · +24209% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
1
Trust
3
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • Page loads in 2.7s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 176ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$650 6.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$50 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,277 / month at risk ~$99,327 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,277 /mo

+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.07 /mo

924.2 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~92 KB per page load
    Saves $0.07/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

86
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
66
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.12 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.68 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

66 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.179

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.71 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
66
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

710 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

816 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

816 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 81.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Alpine.js · 163 peers
You 82
·
Avg 81
At average
0 50 100
Better than 57% of Alpine.js sites See full Alpine.js benchmark →
Bunny Fonts · 13 peers
You 82
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Better than 61% of Bunny Fonts sites See full Bunny Fonts benchmark →

Technology stack

Alpine.js 3.15.12, on PHP, with Bunny CDN

9 technologies detected 3 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Alpine.js 3.15.12 Bunny Fonts Laravel Livewire Open Graph Tailwind CSS
Runtime
PHP 8.2.33
CDN
Bunny Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (9)

Categories CDN Website https://bunny.net Detected by BeaverCheck

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.33
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Alpine.js is a minimal framework for composing behavior directly in your markup.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://alpinejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Bunny Fonts is an open-source, privacy-first web font platform designed to put privacy back into the internet.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.bunny.net Detected by BeaverCheck

Laravel is a free, open-source PHP web framework.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://laravel.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Livewire is a full-stack Laravel framework for building dynamic interfaces.

Categories Web frameworks, Miscellaneous Website https://laravel-livewire.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 184 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Observations (3)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'PHP 8.2.33'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Alpine.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/fellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/fellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffellow-openings-extending-every.trycloudflare.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Cookie 'XSRF-TOKEN' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · 4 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback