Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB stable →
156ms
FCP stable →
1.0s
LCP stable →
1.0s
Scanned
2026-05-04 10:45 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
58.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 608ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (125ms), slowest from Singapore (1111ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
800ms
DNS 310ms · TLS 162ms
Spain - Madrid
136ms
DNS 48ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
125ms
DNS 48ms · TLS 26ms
United Stated - New York
439ms
DNS 174ms · TLS 87ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1038ms
DNS 419ms · TLS 205ms
Singapore - Singapore
1111ms
DNS 343ms · TLS 255ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 608ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Page weight 610 KB over 1MB target

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Unattributable: 347ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your server takes 800ms to respond — every other performance metric inherits that delay. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€733 investment → €710/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€733
9.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€710
€8,518/yr
Payback
1.0 mo
+1061% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5730.8 mo payback · +1386% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€13 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~3%.

Barriers
2
2 warn
Bounce delta
+3pp
added vs baseline
Score
94
A
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€733 9.2 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€13 1 fixes in ~10 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€42,376 / month at risk ~€508,518 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500,000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€709 /mo

+3.2pp bounce · ~322 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.37 /mo

5020.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~502 KB per page load
    Saves €0.37/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.09 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

102 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.87 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.32 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

275 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

296 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

915 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

298 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 86.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3771 peers
You 86
·
Avg 73
+13 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Compliance P98Content P94Performance P93SEO P82Infrastructure P27Sustainability P72Accessibility P60

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2430 peers
You 86
·
Avg 75
+11 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P97Security P96Content P94Performance P89SEO P82Infrastructure P23Sustainability P67Accessibility P54

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

3 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Open Graph

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=HPZwhfgUFzTBUml-6oj_bE-NJCJcrphdGt2j8CAZ770

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/1454d1e4-18a1-40e8-8c68-480f45b2ffe5)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/1454d1e4-18a1-40e8-8c68-480f45b2ffe5"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmymoonova.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 9h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Unattributable: 347ms CPU time

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 3h → A (90)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · Page weight 610 KB over 1MB target

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (92)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback