Audit overview
5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 13.3 MB (7.6 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
14 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
₩507,500 investment → ₩2,797,809/month returns + KRW 3,000,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.
- Page takes 20.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 18.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.6sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 14 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
₩3,000,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
- 2 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
₩2,795,223 /mo
+34.9pp bounce · ~3,494 lost visitors/mo
CPC: KRW 800.00
Bandwidth Waste
₩2,586 /mo
23920.2 MB/mo × 108.108 KRW/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.4 MB per page loadSaves ₩2,586/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.21 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
20.67 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.56 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.186
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
14.21 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
35.87 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.73 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.83 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
120 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.249
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.68 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.88 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 13.3 MB (7.6 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
14 control(s) without accessible label
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 93+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Amazon Route 53, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN
Stack Architecture
DoubleClick Floodlight 
Google Analytics 
Google Publisher Tag 
Google Tag Manager 
Microsoft Clarity 
Funding Choices 
Google Font API Google Search Console 
HTTP/3 
Handlebars 4.0.5
JW Player 
Open Graph 
Swiper 
VideoJS 7.20.2
jQuery 1.12.3
jQuery UI 1.12.1
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront 
Amazon S3 cdnjs 
AWS Amazon Web Services All Detected Technologies (23)
Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.
Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Funding Choices is a messaging tool that can help you comply with the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and recover lost revenue from ad blocking users.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Handlebars is a JavaScript library used to create reusable webpage templates.
JW Player is a online video player with video engagement analytics, custom video player skins, and live video streaming capability.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.
Observations (3)
No build tool detected
A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
jQuery version may be outdated
Detected jQuery 1.12.3. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.
Complex technology stack detected
23 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/157b4ff2-3d3a-4700-925e-9cc419516ad4)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/157b4ff2-3d3a-4700-925e-9cc419516ad4"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkbs.co.kr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkbs.co.krExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (76)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 13.3 MB (7.6 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 14 control(s) without accessible label
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found