Audit overview
Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
69 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cookie '__cf_bm' has no SameSite attribute
Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.
Cookie 'ct0' is missing the HttpOnly flag
Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€595 investment → €6,675/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.
- Page takes 13.3s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 10.8s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 5 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 238ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Viewport disables user zoomVisitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk→ Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- 2 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interactionGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- 2 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interactionGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 2 tracking cookie(s) set before consent interactionePrivacy Directive: EUR 5.000 – EUR 100.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6.674 /mo
+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€0,39 /mo
5281.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~528 KB per page loadSaves €0,39/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
9.51 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
13.31 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
238 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
9.51 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
13.34 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.19 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.86 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
353 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.299
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.27 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.86 s
Categories
8Performance
69 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Security
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Accessibility
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apple sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Apple, on Envoy/Node.js, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN
Stack Architecture
Apple Sign-in 
Plaid 
Webpack 
Arkose Labs 
Cloudflare Bot Management Google Play app Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft Native app preferred 
Open Graph 
React React Native for Web 
core-js 3.33.0
Node.js 
Envoy 
Amazon S3 Cloudflare 
Amazon Web Services 
Express All Detected Technologies (22)
Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.
Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.
Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment that executes JavaScript code outside a web browser.
Arkose Labs is a toolkit for fraud prevention that provides solutions to detect and mitigate malicious activity across digital platforms.
Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
React Native for Web is a library that allows developers to use React Native components and patterns to build cross-platform web applications alongside native mobile applications.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Apple Sign-in is based on OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect, and provides a privacy-friendly way for users to sign in to websites and apps.
Plaid is a fintech company that facilitates communication between financial services apps and users' banks and credit card providers.
Observations (1)
Complex technology stack detected
22 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/18c3e462-2a2b-4482-ac8a-b18244aaaaad)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/18c3e462-2a2b-4482-ac8a-b18244aaaaad"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (82)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+4Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
- · 69 third-party resources (100% of weight)
- · Cookie '__cf_bm' has no SameSite attribute
- · Cookie 'ct0' is missing the HttpOnly flag
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+2Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source