Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:17 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
56.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Compliance need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Cookie 'bh' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie 'is_gdpr' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie 'is_gdpr_b' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽44,625 investment → ₽321,511/month returns

Investment
₽44 625
12.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₽321 511
₽3 858 129/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+8546% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽42 8750.1 mo payback · +8899% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽2 625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽44,625 12.8 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽2,625 3 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽212 611 / month at risk ~₽2 551 334 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽212 604 /mo

+35.4pp bounce · ~3,543 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽7,13 /mo

980.5 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~98 KB per page load
    Saves ₽7,13/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

73
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.70 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.48 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

29 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.028

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.48 s

Desktop

79
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

916 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.06 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.93 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.06 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Facebook · 1418 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P95Accessibility P92Sustainability P82Security P20SEO P24Content P63Infrastructure P58

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 78% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3873 peers
You 76
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Performance P89Accessibility P89SEO P21Security P23Sustainability P73Content P66Infrastructure P54

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 61 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 70% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Facebook

4 technologies detected 1 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Facebook Google Search Console Open Graph React 19.2.1

All Detected Technologies (4)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=625igbkehyfptcek6nh1hz7q4s3h4a
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=FVk3gum7zZLdkqi96ypScROFMew0wMetq1Gpu4rkzPI

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/19be1987-ffc3-40ee-8883-09dbd8d118de)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/19be1987-ffc3-40ee-8883-09dbd8d118de"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fyandex.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (84)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (82)
  • · Cookie 'bh' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'is_gdpr' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'is_gdpr_b' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (84)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback