Skip to content
https://strictmx.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB degrading ↓
349ms
FCP stable →
1.0s
LCP stable →
1.2s
Scanned
2026-08-19 11:47 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
43.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 596ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (267ms), slowest from Singapore (1309ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
304ms
DNS 32ms · TLS 96ms
United Stated - New York
267ms
DNS 230ms · TLS 16ms
Spain - Madrid
341ms
DNS 36ms · TLS 104ms
United States - Santa Clara
534ms
DNS 328ms · TLS 72ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
819ms
DNS 417ms · TLS 139ms
Singapore - Singapore
1309ms
DNS 512ms · TLS 269ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 596ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

3

Small gains, minimal effort.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

Unattributable: 365ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 2

https://strictmx.com/: 606ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 3

1 field(s) would benefit from inputmode attribute

Mobile browsers pick the on-screen keyboard layout from inputmode= -- adding it saves 2-3 keyboard mode-switches per phone-number / numeric-ID field.

Accessibility › Mobile Keyboard & Autofill
Warning: 4

No favicon.ico at site root

Browsers auto-request /favicon.ico on every visit — a 404 wastes a request and shows a blank icon in tabs.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)

Without a skip-nav link, keyboard users tab through every nav item before reaching content — every page, every visit.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 2 performance issues below shape how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€93 investment → €410/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€93
1.2 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€410
€4.918/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+5169% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€930.2 mo payback · +5169% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~2%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+2pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
1
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€93 1.2 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€93 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€410 / month at risk ~€4.918 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€410 /mo

+1.6pp bounce · ~164 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.50

Bandwidth Waste

€0,03 /mo

364.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~36 KB per page load
    Saves €0,03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

990 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.22 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

33 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.010

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.22 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

330 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

369 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.008

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

582 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

369 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 91.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4127 peers
You 93
·
Avg 74
+19 above average
0 50 100
SEO P99Security P97Accessibility P97Content P97Performance P96Sustainability P92Compliance P14Infrastructure P73

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2853 peers
You 93
·
Avg 76
+17 above average
0 50 100
SEO P99Security P96Content P96Accessibility P95Performance P94Sustainability P89Compliance P19Infrastructure P71

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, hosted on OVH

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns109.ovh.net
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=XnfXKJGe7_KAGVfLvHrR_uwehUqda4WrxD0oxaTciY0

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstrictmx.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/strictmx.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/strictmx.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstrictmx.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstrictmx.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected A (95)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → A (95)
  • · Unattributable: 365ms CPU time
  • · https://strictmx.com/: 606ms CPU time
  • · No favicon.ico at site root
  • · 1 field(s) would benefit from inputmode attribute
  • · Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)

Send Feedback