Skip to content
https://companies.si Export & share
SI · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €45/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
55
TTFB stable →
645ms
FCP stable →
4.1s
LCP stable →
8.9s
Scanned
2026-08-06 14:48 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 897ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (388ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1387ms). Cloudflare in front. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
1387ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 10ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
388ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 11ms
Spain - Madrid
414ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 25ms
United Stated - New York
673ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
1260ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 11ms
Singapore - Singapore
1263ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 17ms
CDN: Cloudflare · Avg TTFB: 897ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page body has only 130 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 5

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€326 investment → €8,265/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€326
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€8.265
€99.184/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+30301% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2810.0 mo payback · +35165% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€56 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
9
1 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
66
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 9.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 361ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€326 7.3 developer hours at €45/hr
Quick wins
€56 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.211 / month at risk ~€38.536 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.211 /mo

+29.9pp bounce · ~2,990 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,30 /mo

4026.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~403 KB per page load
    Saves €0,30/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

55
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.09 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.41 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

361 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.41 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.79 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

68 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.69 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.79 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 603 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
SEO P3Performance P97Compliance P4Accessibility P96Sustainability P96Content P12Security P84Infrastructure P69

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 84 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Google Font API · 1092 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Accessibility P97Performance P96SEO P7Sustainability P92Security P88Content P16Infrastructure P58

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Cloudflare CDN

10 technologies detected 3 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Google Font API HTTP/3 Leaflet 1.9.4 Livefyre 1.9.4 Svelte SvelteKit Tailwind CSS Vite
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (10)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Leaflet is the open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps.

Categories Maps Website https://leafletjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Livefyre is a platform that integrates with the social web to boost social interaction.

Categories Comment systems Website https://livefyre.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Svelte is a free and open-source front end compiler created by Rich Harris and maintained by the Svelte core team members.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://svelte.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

SvelteKit is the official Svelte framework for building web applications with a flexible filesystem-based routing.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://kit.svelte.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 70 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Vite is a rapid development tool for modern web projects.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://vitejs.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompanies.si)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/companies.si)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/companies.si"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompanies.si" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcompanies.si

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (89)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 130 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback