Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 2182ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (1796ms), slowest from Madrid (2616ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
homex.ae fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.
Certificate expires soon (26 days remaining)
Cert expiry within the renewal window — fix now while there's no user impact, instead of after expiry when there's a full outage.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
AED 1,188 investment → AED 30,080/month returns
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.
- Page takes 6.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 3.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Bounce-Rate Cost
AED 17,269 /mo
+19.7pp bounce · ~1,967 lost visitors/mo
CPC: AED 8.78
Bandwidth Waste
AED 3.27 /mo
11027.5 MB/mo × 0.296 AED/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page loadSaves AED 3.27/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.01 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
6.02 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
182 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.17 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.11 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
986 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.18 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.002
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
986 ms
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.18 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Framer Motion, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
WhatsApp Business Chat 
Framer Motion Google Search Console 
Leaflet 1.9.4
Livefyre 1.9.4
Lucide Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Open Graph 
Radix UI 
React 
React Router 6
Tailwind CSS 
shadcn/ui 
Apache Apache HTTP Server All Detected Technologies (16)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.
Leaflet is the open-source JavaScript library for mobile-friendly interactive maps.
Livefyre is a platform that integrates with the social web to boost social interaction.
Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Radix UI is a React-based user interface component library that offers accessible, responsive, and customisable components for building web applications.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
React Router provides declarative routing for React.
Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.
shadcn/ui is a component system built with Radix UI and Tailwind CSS.
WhatsApp Business is a free to download app available on Android and iPhone using which businesses can connect with their customers.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Framer Motion) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
16 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/homex.ae)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/homex.ae"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.homex.ae" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.homex.aeExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
- · 1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)
- · Certificate expires soon (26 days remaining)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing