Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 13:32 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
32.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 93ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (23ms), slowest from Singapore (218ms). AWS CloudFront edge cache (Hit from cloudfront). Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
92ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 19ms
United States - Santa Clara
89ms
DNS 75ms · TLS 7ms
Singapore - Singapore
218ms
DNS 203ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
110ms
DNS 98ms · TLS 7ms
United Stated - New York
23ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
25ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 7ms
CDN: AWS CloudFront (Hit from cloudfront) · Avg TTFB: 93ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page body has only 154 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 5

1 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$825 investment → $12,029/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$825
8.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$12,029
$144,351/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17397% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +22996% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 211ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$825 8.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,532 / month at risk ~$246,381 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,407 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.19 /mo

2393.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~239 KB per page load
    Saves $0.19/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

65
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
42
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.85 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

211 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.85 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.15 s

Desktop

95
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
42
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

888 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.37 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

17 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

996 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.38 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 855 peers
You 79
·
Avg 73
+6 above average
0 50 100
SEO P1Compliance P1Security P95Accessibility P95Performance P92Content P17Infrastructure P18Sustainability P57

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
core-js · 1555 peers
You 79
·
Avg 72
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1SEO P3Performance P97Security P95Accessibility P95Content P11Infrastructure P17Sustainability P73

Top 10% of core-js sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, on JSS, hosted on AWS, with AWS CloudFront CDN

14 technologies detected 5 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Build
Create React App
Framework
Bootstrap MUI Material UI Material-UI React Sentry core-js 3.46.0
Runtime
JSS
CDN
AWS CloudFront Amazon CloudFront Amazon S3
Hosting
AWS Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (14)

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-amz-cf-id: e0Xrq2tex42dqH9W5NwON9WWWGJEomOJVu8qXhh7xfRf5yKRKIrFvg==

Amazon CloudFront is a fast content delivery network (CDN) service that securely delivers data, videos, applications, and APIs to customers globally with low latency, high transfer speeds.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/cloudfront/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Hosting Website https://aws.amazon.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Header: X-Amz-Cf-Pop

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

JSS is an authoring tool for CSS which allows you to use JavaScript to describe styles in a declarative, conflict-free and reusable way.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://cssinjs.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Library Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Stylesheet: https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/4.1.0/css/bootstrap.min.css

MUI(formerly Material UI) is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Material UI is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 59 MUI class names (e.g. MuiButton) in HTML

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Build Tool Website https://create-react-app.dev Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence CRA chunk pattern: https://Www.mybni.com/static/js/main.88c0f56d.chunk.js

Observations (1)

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FWww.mybni.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/1d4e3b07-2cbf-405f-8658-3ae599696d5d)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/1d4e3b07-2cbf-405f-8658-3ae599696d5d"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FWww.mybni.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FWww.mybni.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Page body has only 154 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (86)
  • · 1 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback