Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB degrading ↓
672ms
FCP stable →
808ms
LCP stable →
808ms
Scanned
2026-05-10 09:41 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
51.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 531ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (98ms), slowest from Singapore (830ms). No CDN detected. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
672ms
DNS 37ms · TLS 319ms
United States - Santa Clara
98ms
DNS 32ms · TLS 34ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
605ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 302ms
Singapore - Singapore
830ms
DNS 100ms · TLS 365ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
717ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 338ms
United Stated - New York
264ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 131ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 531ms · Cache: private; max-age=0

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 3

1 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

31 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€808 investment → €4,328/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€808
9.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€4,328
€51,938/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6332% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€6380.1 mo payback · +8047% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€85 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+20pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
3
  • 105 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • 1 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€808 9.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€85 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€1,712,661 / month at risk ~€20,551,938 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20,500,000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No headings found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 1 image-in-link without alt text
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • 1 control(s) without accessible label
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€4,328 /mo

+19.7pp bounce · ~1,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0.00 /mo

35.2 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~4 KB per page load
    Saves €0.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
52
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

808 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

808 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.34 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

808 ms

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
52
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
75
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

217 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

217 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

534 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

217 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 79.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2430 peers
You 83
·
Avg 75
+8 above average
0 50 100
Content P2Performance P96Security P95Compliance P10Accessibility P80SEO P23Sustainability P71Infrastructure P70

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 60 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 93% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
RSS · 852 peers
You 83
·
Avg 74
+9 above average
0 50 100
SEO P1Content P2Security P98Compliance P3Performance P96Accessibility P81Sustainability P70Infrastructure P66

Top 10% of RSS sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 82 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of RSS sites See full RSS benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, with Nginx CDN

3 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS RSS
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (3)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/1e6f4715-b902-471f-98f4-c936b26bfc96)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/1e6f4715-b902-471f-98f4-c936b26bfc96"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.ycombinator.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 10h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · 1 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 31 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → B (88)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback