Skip to content
https://mk.co.kr Export & share
KR · KRW (₩) · Estimated Applicable regulations: PIPA Dev cost: ₩70,000/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:03 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.9m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 21.0 MB (17.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 26.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 26.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₩542,500 investment → ₩12,668,442/month returns + KRW 3,000,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
₩542,500
7.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₩12,668,442
₩152,021,309/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+27922% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided KRW 3,000,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₩437,5000.0 mo payback · +34648% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₩17,500 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
1
  • Page takes 26.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 24.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 626ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₩542,500 7.8 developer hours at ₩70000/hr
Quick wins
₩17,500 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₩12,668,442 / month at risk ~₩152,021,309 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

₩3,000,000,000

PIPA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
  • 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    PIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PIPA: KRW 1,000,000 – KRW 3,000,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

₩12,662,456 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: KRW 4729.73

Bandwidth Waste

₩5,987 /mo

55377.7 MB/mo × 108.108 KRW/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~5.5 MB per page load
    Saves ₩5,987/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

32
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
76
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

14.84 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

26.61 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

626 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.170

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

14.84 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

34.26 s

Desktop

55
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
77
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.69 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.78 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

21 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.079

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.92 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.58 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3817 peers
You 69
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P3Sustainability P6Content P94Infrastructure P7Performance P16Compliance P16Security P30SEO P45

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 71+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 7% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Open Graph · 3415 peers
You 69
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P3Sustainability P6Infrastructure P7Content P92Compliance P11Performance P14SEO P28Security P35

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 74+ on Accessibility; you're at 45 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 4% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

9 technologies detected 2 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
DoubleClick Floodlight Google Analytics Google Publisher Tag Google Tag Manager Naver Analytics Taboola
Framework
Google Search Console Open Graph Swiper

All Detected Technologies (9)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=3MV2q9bZibVUUyEKf7lVrou3Fsad6ZoqJqJzMqD65-w

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Advertising Website https://support.google.com/ds/answer/6029713?hl=en Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.

Categories Advertising Website https://developers.google.com/publisher-tag/guides/get-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-PCEC2HQM86&cx=c&gtm=4e64k0

Naver Analytics is a Korean based analytics service.

Categories Analytics Website https://analytics.naver.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Taboola is a content discovery & native advertising platform for publishers and advertisers.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.taboola.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmk.co.kr)](https://beavercheck.com/results/1f9e3f5b-73b9-4ebd-8eae-ab1698959049)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/1f9e3f5b-73b9-4ebd-8eae-ab1698959049"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmk.co.kr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmk.co.kr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (74)
  • · Page weighs 21.0 MB (17.6 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → C (79)
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback