Skip to content
ES · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:42 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
31.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 13.3 MB (11.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 50.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 50.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€353 investment → €8,005/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€353
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€8.005
€96.057/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+27118% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3440.0 mo payback · +27844% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€23 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~36%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+36pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 50.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 48.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 396ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€353 6.4 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€23 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€8.005 / month at risk ~€96.057 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€8.002 /mo

+36.4pp bounce · ~3,637 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€2,61 /mo

35196.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.5 MB per page load
    Saves €2,61/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 70.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Drupal · 368 peers
You 73
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 36% of Drupal sites See full Drupal benchmark →
Facebook · 1434 peers
You 73
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P5Content P7Compliance P8SEO P9Security P85Performance P79Infrastructure P62Accessibility P39

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 86+ on Sustainability; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 45% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Drupal, on Apache/PHP, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

8 technologies detected 5 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

CMS
Drupal
Framework
Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace Microsoft 365
Runtime
PHP
Server
Apache
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.

Categories CMS Website https://www.drupal.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=rpm9hbx9inlfpos2y0zdpavawba6j1
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=Hl-Nbec49Zfa0pm6C72gyhJ0tL79d8IptxByLLz0Ijc
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 a:listas.usal.es a:aida.usal.es include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com ~all

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusal.es)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/usal.es)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/usal.es"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusal.es" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fusal.es

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (79)
  • · Page weighs 13.3 MB (11.2 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback