Skip to content
DE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DSGVO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-31 19:20 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.8m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 296ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (114ms), slowest from Santa Clara (565ms). Cloudflare edge cache (BYPASS). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
138ms
DNS 35ms · TLS 26ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
114ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
269ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 14ms
United States - Santa Clara
565ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
378ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 10ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
309ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 12ms
CDN: Cloudflare (BYPASS) · Avg TTFB: 296ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 4

1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WPML ver:4.5.5 stt:1,3;

Each disclosed version enables direct CVE lookup -- attacker reads the version, searches the CVE database, targets the site with a tested exploit.

Security › HTML Version Disclosure
Warning: 5

10 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 20.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 20.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€758 investment → €7,087/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€758
8.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€7.087
€85.041/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11127% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5550.1 mo payback · +15223% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€38 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~32%.

Barriers
7
4 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+32pp
added vs baseline
Score
51
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 20.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 17.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 900ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€758 8.4 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€38 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.087 / month at risk ~€85.041 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 3 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.086 /mo

+32.2pp bounce · ~3,221 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,78 /mo

10559.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page load
    Saves €0,78/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

14
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

9.49 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

20.32 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

900 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.519

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

9.49 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

21.47 s

Desktop

80
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.92 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

10 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.061

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.28 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.23 s

Categories

8
Avg score 83.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 859 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Security P90Accessibility P87SEO P31Sustainability P66Performance P59Content P42Compliance P56Infrastructure P50

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 91 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 88% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
Apple · 1286 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95Security P93Sustainability P80Performance P76Infrastructure P70Content P70Compliance P59SEO P53

Top 10% of Apple sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 91 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on PHP, hosted on Google Cloud, with Cloudflare CDN

31 technologies detected 6 stack layers 8 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Google Tag Manager The Events Calendar WPML 4.5.5 Yoast SEO
CMS
WordPress
Framework
Apple Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.6Facebook Font Awesome Google Cloud Storage Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365 MobX Modernizr 3.6.0 MySQL Open Graph Qualtrics RequireJS 2.3.6 Slick Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.17.21 Usercentrics jQuery 3.7.1
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare jsDelivr CDN
Hosting
Google Cloud WordPress.com

All Detected Technologies (31)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/hls.js@latest

Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.

Categories IaaS Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress.com is a platform for self-publishing that is popular for blogging and other works.

Categories PaaS Website https://wordpress.com Detected by BeaverCheck

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://schalke04.de/cms/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.6.0
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=aNMdyD1ja1eZeneh

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 8 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=rt74f2g9ugo2vdwxr5ujpm8o3a5svv

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storage and retrieval of any amount of data at any time.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://cloud.google.com/storage Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=wf8INi4HMactEgffQYH6jo2-uelLv4-fBhFfHD7B0ik

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms17506156
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 mx include:spf.mailjet.com include:aspmx.pardot.com include:_spf.salesforce.com ip4:116.203.247.78 ip4:85.13.128.164 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.eu.exclaimer.net include:_spf.icubic.com include:amazonses.com ~all
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Modernizr is a JavaScript library that detects the features available in a user's browser.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://modernizr.com Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Qualtrics is an cloud-based platform for creating and distributing web-based surveys.

Categories Surveys Website https://www.qualtrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

RequireJS is a JavaScript library and file loader which manages the dependencies between JavaScript files and in modular programming.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://requirejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://kenwheeler.github.io/slick Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 10 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Usercentrics is a SaaS enterprise solution for Consent Management (CMP) that helps enterprise customers to obtain, manage and document the user consent.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://usercentrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://schalke04.de/cms/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.min.js?ver=3.6.0, Script URL: https://schalke04.de/cms/wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery-migrate.min.js?ver=3.3.2
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: //www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PVT8RKX

The Events Calendar is a free event management plugin for WordPress.

Categories WordPress plugins Website https://theeventscalendar.com Detected by BeaverCheck

WPML plugin makes it possible to build and run fully multilingual WordPress sites.

Categories WordPress plugins, Translation Website https://wpml.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Yoast SEO is a search engine optimisation plugin for WordPress and other platforms.

Categories SEO, WordPress plugins Website https://yoast.com/wordpress/plugins/seo/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (4)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 4.0.0-alpha.6. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

31 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fschalke04.de)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/schalke04.de)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/schalke04.de"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fschalke04.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fschalke04.de

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 1 software version(s) disclosed in HTML: WPML ver:4.5.5 stt:1,3;

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 10 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback