https://learn.microsoft.com Export & share

Scanned

2026-04-04 18:29 UTC

Worker

🇸🇬 Singapore

Duration

1.1m

Vs prev

—

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Impact

Quick Wins

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE

Desktop

Mobile

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality

3 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers

What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.

3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,450 investment → $9,709/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment

$1,450

14.5 h · 5 findings

Monthly returns

$9,709

$116,505/yr

Payback

0.1 mo

+7935% Y1

Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000

Or — fix only the top 3 findings

$1,250 → 0.1 mo payback · +9220% Y1

Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers

2 crit 2 warn

Bounce delta

+25pp

added vs baseline

Score

Speed

Trust

Usability

Content

Nav

Page takes 12.3s to load
Users abandon at ~3s — you're 9.8s over the 2.5s threshold
→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
3 form field(s) without a label
Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
No Content-Security-Policy header
Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Content is hard to read
Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,450 14.5 developer hours at $100/hr

Quick wins

$50 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

Custom rate

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,771 / month at risk ~$81,257 / year if left unfixed

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III

3 control(s) without accessible label
ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,771 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.49 /mo

6135.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

Optimize transfer: save ~614 KB per page load
Saves $0.49/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Monthly visitors

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Conversion rate (%)

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Avg. order value

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue

Current bounce (est.)

After fixes (est.)

Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.81 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

12.28 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

101 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.34 s

Desktop

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.30 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.45 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

42 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.83 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.70 s

Categories

Avg score 81.6

Performance

Good

/100

All checks pass

Security

2 critical

/100

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Accessibility

2 critical

/100

2 button(s) with no accessible text

SEO

Excellent

/100

All checks pass

Infrastructure

Excellent

/100

All checks pass

Compliance

Good

/100

All checks pass

Content

Excellent

/100

All checks pass

Sustainability

/100

All checks pass

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Arkose Labs · 10 peers

You 80

Avg 75

At average

0 50 100

Better than 90% of Arkose Labs sites See full Arkose Labs benchmark →

Azure Edge Network · 16 peers

You 80

Avg 75

At average

0 50 100

Better than 81% of Azure Edge Network sites See full Azure Edge Network benchmark →

Technology stack

Arkose Labs, hosted on Azure, with Azure CDN CDN

11 technologies detected 4 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics

Azure Monitor

Framework

Arkose Labs

Azure Edge Network

Azure Front Door

Bulma HSTS

Open Graph

Tailwind CSS

lit-html 1.4.1

CDN

Azure CDN

Hosting

Azure

All Detected Technologies (11)

Categories CDN Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-azure-ref: 20260404T182804Z-r1c6f98c89d8pfhfhC1HKGggns0000000ca000000000357d

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-azure-ref

Arkose Labs is a toolkit for fraud prevention that provides solutions to detect and mitigate malicious activity across digital platforms.

Categories Security Website https://www.arkoselabs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Edge Network is a global network infrastructure provided by Microsoft Azure. It is designed to deliver content, applications, and services to end-users with low latency and high performance. The Azure Edge Network consists of a combination of Azure Content Delivery Network (CDN), Azure Front Door, and Azure Traffic Manager.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cdn/cdn-overview Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Front Door is a scalable and secure entry point for fast delivery of your global web applications.

Categories Load balancers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 25 Bulma class patterns in HTML

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 15 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Monitor collects monitoring telemetry from a variety of on-premises and Azure sources. Azure Monitor helps you maximise the availability and performance of your applications and services.

Categories Analytics, Performance Website https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/monitor Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Arkose Labs) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

Markdown

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.microsoft.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/2153356a-9df1-4cf5-86ac-633e528180b5)

HTML

<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/2153356a-9df1-4cf5-86ac-633e528180b5"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.microsoft.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>

Image URL

https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flearn.microsoft.com

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (81)

· 2 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → B (84)

· 3 control(s) without accessible label
· Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (87)

· 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
· 'unsafe-inline' found in script source