Audit overview
Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
13 image-in-link without alt text
Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.
15 control(s) without accessible label
Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.
20 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
23 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
3 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€320 investment → €2,484/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.
- Page takes 15.5s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 13.0s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 15 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 579ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 23 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance→ Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedRGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 3 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedRGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundRGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€2.483 /mo
+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 0.85
Bandwidth Waste
€0,49 /mo
6581.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~658 KB per page loadSaves €0,49/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
7.30 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
15.53 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
579 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.30 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
15.73 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.13 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.65 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
26 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.63 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.53 s
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
13 image-in-link without alt text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Bootstrap, with Nginx CDN
Stack Architecture
AT Internet Analyzer 
Batch 
Facebook Pixel 2.9.303
Google Sign-in 
Google Tag Manager 
Kameleoon 
Taboola 
Teads 
Utiq 
Cart Functionality 
Bootstrap 
Didomi Facebook Facebook SDK Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
Open Graph 
RSS 
Svelte 
Varnish 
core-js 3.32.2
jQuery 3.6.1
Nginx All Detected Technologies (24)
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Didomi is a consent management platform helping brands and businesses collect, store and leverage their customer consents.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
Svelte is a free and open-source front end compiler created by Rich Harris and maintained by the Svelte core team members.
Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Batch is a web-push notifications technology provider.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Sign-In is a secure authentication system that reduces the burden of login for users, by enabling them to sign in with their Google account.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Kameleoon is a personalisation technology platform for real-time omnichannel optimisation and conversion.
Taboola is a content discovery & native advertising platform for publishers and advertisers.
Teads is a technology provider that sells ads on publisher websites.
Utiq empowers brands and publishers to address audiences through Telco-powered first-party identifier.
Observations (3)
jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework
Both jQuery and Svelte are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.
No build tool detected
A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
24 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/230aa55c-6f25-4d79-8f22-c50cc1791b87)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/230aa55c-6f25-4d79-8f22-c50cc1791b87"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fladepeche.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fladepeche.frExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (80)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 13 image-in-link without alt text
- · 23 link(s) with no accessible text
- · 3 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 15 control(s) without accessible label
- · 20 image(s) missing alt attribute