Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance degrading ↓
36
TTFB degrading ↓
175ms
FCP stable →
3.7s
LCP degrading ↓
13.3s
Scanned
2026-04-12 14:06 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
47.00s
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Strong global performance — average 127ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (44ms), slowest from Madrid (216ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
84ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 10ms
Spain - Madrid
Full audit
216ms
DNS 132ms · TLS 19ms
United States - Santa Clara
Full audit
44ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
Full audit
54ms
DNS 20ms · TLS 7ms
Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
188ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 5ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
175ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 5ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 127ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$717 investment → $10,034/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$717
7.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$10,034
$120,409/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16701% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.1 mo payback · +18424% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$117 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 12.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.2s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$717 7.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$117 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,407 / month at risk ~$88,883 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,407 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.37 /mo

4631.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~463 KB per page load
    Saves $0.37/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

38
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.40 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

12.56 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.19 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.085

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.93 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.70 s

Desktop

90
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

921 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

964 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

145 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.39 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Facebook · 1418 peers
You 71
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Security P15Performance P79SEO P24Content P66Accessibility P61Compliance P44Sustainability P49

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 22% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3873 peers
You 71
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Security P18SEO P21Content P69Performance P67Sustainability P40Accessibility P58Compliance P48

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 21% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Facebook

5 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Facebook Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=hiqltzmr7yrusmgfntnkxfgkb5u2tm
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=GpsmbpsLILYk3Kq9pLJXUil-TZ8NW1hrGKIt2whBGxE

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.threads.net)](https://beavercheck.com/results/23254ffa-c02c-4b01-b336-ca5f371fa0fb)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/23254ffa-c02c-4b01-b336-ca5f371fa0fb"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.threads.net" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.threads.net

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback