Skip to content
https://virgilio.it Export & share
IT · EUR (€) Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
46
TTFB stable →
137ms
FCP stable →
3.6s
LCP stable →
10.4s
Scanned
2026-07-10 11:33 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev
Improved by +5

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 596ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (137ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (978ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
137ms
DNS 22ms · TLS 60ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
310ms
DNS 163ms · TLS 77ms
United Stated - New York
484ms
DNS 90ms · TLS 200ms
United States - Santa Clara
830ms
DNS 170ms · TLS 332ms
Singapore - Singapore
838ms
DNS 160ms · TLS 342ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
978ms
DNS 154ms · TLS 415ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 596ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

170 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€399 investment → €13,509/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€399
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€13.509
€162.109/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+40554% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€3440.0 mo payback · +47059% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€69 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
3
  • Page takes 10.4s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.9s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 684ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€399 7.3 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€69 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€9.393 / month at risk ~€112.713 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • 4 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 28 of 28 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€9.392 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 3.24

Bandwidth Waste

€0,29 /mo

3927.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~393 KB per page load
    Saves €0,29/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

46
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.64 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.43 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

684 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.05 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.76 s

Desktop

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
81
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

582 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

994 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

8 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.12 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

CMS · 1787 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Better than 93% of CMS sites
WordPress · 803 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P91Security P90SEO P83Compliance P18Infrastructure P20Performance P70Content P34Sustainability P58

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

Italiaonline, with Nginx CDN

14 technologies detected 4 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Amazon Advertising DoubleClick Floodlight Google Publisher Tag Google Tag Manager Prebid
CMS
Italiaonline WordPress
Framework
Google Search Console Open Graph Permutive Priority Hints Swiper iubenda
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (14)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Italiaonline is a web platform that provides tools and services for building and managing websites.

Categories Page builders Website https://www.italiaonline.it Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories CMS Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence robots.txt Disallow pattern: /wp-admin/
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=WQJJrYaB0tSgywyeDvjnd7DPBW0lLg2iskMeV9I7a6s

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Permutive is a publisher-focused data management platform.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://permutive.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

iubenda is a compliance software used by businesses for their websites and apps.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://www.iubenda.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Amazon Advertising (formerly AMS or Amazon Marketing Services) is a service that works in a similar way to pay-per-click ads on Google.

Categories Advertising Website https://advertising.amazon.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Advertising Website https://support.google.com/ds/answer/6029713?hl=en Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Publisher Tag (GPT) is an ad tagging library for Google Ad Manager which is used to dynamically build ad requests.

Categories Advertising Website https://developers.google.com/publisher-tag/guides/get-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Prebid is an open-source header bidding wrapper. It forms the core of our Nucleus ad platform, helping maximize revenue and performance for publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://prebid.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvirgilio.it)](https://beavercheck.com/results/23aaaeac-6126-4313-959f-9989bd87f929)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/23aaaeac-6126-4313-959f-9989bd87f929"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvirgilio.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fvirgilio.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (87)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 170 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback