Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:13 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.7m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 11.0 MB (4.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 4

192 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 5

Cookie 'gk_suid' has no SameSite attribute

Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 25.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 25.7s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,025 investment → $9,533/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$1,025
10.3 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$9,533
$114,395/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11061% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1,0000.1 mo payback · +11340% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$25 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
9
4 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
45
D
Speed
2
Trust
3
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 25.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 23.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.9s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,025 10.3 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$25 1 fixes in ~15 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,533 / month at risk ~$114,395 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • 1 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 5 image(s) with generic alt text
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,532 /mo

+35.4pp bounce · ~3,543 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$1.20 /mo

14939.6 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves $1.20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

29
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

7.73 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

25.71 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.86 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

29.94 s

Desktop

49
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.72 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.72 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

374 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.44 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.41 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Fonts · 238 peers
You 73
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 41% of Adobe Fonts sites See full Adobe Fonts benchmark →
Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 73
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P94Content P9Security P19Infrastructure P78Sustainability P69SEO P57Performance P52Accessibility P52

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 48% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →

Technology stack

Adobe Fonts, with Fastly CDN

17 technologies detected 4 stack layers 3 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Sign-in New Relic
Build
Webpack
Framework
Adobe Fonts Amazon Route 53 CKEditor Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph RSS Varnish Vue.js core-js 3.29.0 jQuery 1.10.2
CDN
Fastly

All Detected Technologies (17)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-iad-kiad7000162-IAD, cache-toj-leto2350029-TOJ

Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.adobe.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-1714.awsdns-22.co.uk

CKEditor is a WYSIWYG rich text editor which enables writing content directly inside of web pages or online applications. Its core code is written in JavaScript and it is developed by CKSource. CKEditor is available under open-source and commercial licenses.

Categories Rich text editors Website https://ckeditor.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=eaYlPjbjY48E_rtwBEPQkPGuNAOxrnqzwVIIi_QH27A
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Sign-In is a secure authentication system that reduces the burden of login for users, by enabling them to sign in with their Google account.

Categories Authentication Website https://developers.google.com/identity/sign-in/web Detected by BeaverCheck

New Relic is a SaaS offering that focuses on performance and availability monitoring.

Categories RUM Website https://newrelic.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://a5.behance.net/d4e647d712234b0bb214acea27fbb0fb7ff83176/js/main.61b6b90d9f6a2e3bb7e8.js

Observations (3)

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and Vue.js are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.10.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.behance.net)](https://beavercheck.com/results/25ff47f1-72b9-30f2-3f40-86073221a525)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/25ff47f1-72b9-30f2-3f40-86073221a525"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.behance.net" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.behance.net

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 10h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (76)
  • · Page weighs 11.0 MB (4.7 MB transferred)
  • · Cookie 'gk_suid' has no SameSite attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 192 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback