Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:44 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

3 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 2

6 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

9 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

Cookie 'pan-lang-cookie' has no SameSite attribute

Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$242 investment → $14,312/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$242
2.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$14,312
$171,742/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+70966% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$2000.0 mo payback · +85771% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$142 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
10
4 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
42
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
3
  • Page takes 6.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 666ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 9 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • 174 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$242 2.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$142 4 fixes in ~85 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,400 / month at risk ~$112,795 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,399 /mo

+34.9pp bounce · ~3,494 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.68 /mo

8558.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~856 KB per page load
    Saves $0.68/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

56
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
99
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.40 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

666 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.04 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.32 s

Desktop

90
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
99
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

870 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.86 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.004

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.19 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Adobe Experience Manager · 166 peers
You 74
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 63% of Adobe Experience Manager sites See full Adobe Experience Manager benchmark →
WordPress · 803 peers
You 74
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P8SEO P9Content P15Performance P70Security P66Compliance P65Sustainability P40Infrastructure P60

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 75+ on Accessibility; you're at 50 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 38% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

Adobe Experience Manager, on Apache/Java, hosted on Apache HTTP Server, with ...

19 technologies detected 7 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Adobe Analytics Adobe Experience Platform Launch Akamai mPulse
CMS
Adobe Experience Manager WordPress
Framework
Boomerang FingerprintJS 1.5.1HSTS Lozad.js OneTrust Open Graph Popper ServiceNow VideoJS 7.20.3 jQuery 3.6.1
Runtime
Java
Server
Apache
CDN
Akamai
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server

All Detected Technologies (19)

Akamai is global content delivery network (CDN) services provider for media and software delivery, and cloud security solutions.

Categories CDN Website https://akamai.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-akamai-transformed: 9 - 0 pmb=mRUM,2
Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Java is a class-based, object-oriented programming language that is designed to have as few implementation dependencies as possible.

Categories Programming languages Website https://java.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) is a content management solution for building websites, mobile apps and forms.

Categories CMS Website https://www.adobe.com/marketing/experience-manager.html Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CMS Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence robots.txt Disallow pattern: /wp-admin/

boomerang is a JavaScript library that measures the page load time experienced by real users, commonly called RUM (Real User Measurement).

Categories JavaScript libraries, RUM Website https://akamai.github.io/boomerang Detected by BeaverCheck

FingerprintJS is a browser fingerprinting library that queries browser attributes and computes a hashed visitor identifier from them.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Browser fingerprinting Website https://fingerprintjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lozad.js is a lightweight lazy-loading library that's just 535 bytes minified & gzipped.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Performance Website https://apoorv.pro/lozad.js/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains cdn.cookielaw.org: https://cdn.cookielaw.org/scripttemplates/otSDKStub.js

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

ServiceNow is a cloud computing platform to help companies manage digital workflows for enterprise operations.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.servicenow.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Video.js is a JavaScript and CSS library that makes it easier to work with and build on HTML5 video.

Categories Video players Website https://videojs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Adobe Analytics is a web analytics, marketing and cross-channel analytics application.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.adobe.com/analytics/adobe-analytics.html Detected by BeaverCheck

Adobe Experience Cloud Launch is an extendable tag management solution for Adobe Experience Cloud, Adobe Experience Platform, and other applications.

Categories Tag managers Website https://docs.adobelaunch.com/getting-started Detected by BeaverCheck

Akamai mPulse is a real user monitoring (RUM) solution that enables companies to monitor, find, and fix website and application performance issues.

Categories RUM Website https://developer.akamai.com/akamai-mpulse-real-user-monitoring-solution Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Boomerang) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

19 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paloaltonetworks.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/280472c2-7e96-c346-59b8-16e4e5d86b59)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/280472c2-7e96-c346-59b8-16e4e5d86b59"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paloaltonetworks.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.paloaltonetworks.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 3 image-only link(s) without alt text
  • · 6 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · Cookie 'pan-lang-cookie' has no SameSite attribute

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · 9 control(s) without accessible label

Send Feedback