Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Excellent global latency — average 14ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (9ms), slowest from Madrid (28ms). No CDN detected.
Audit overview
Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Cookie 'gu_client_ab_tests' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Cookie 'gu_v2_mvt_id' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
No H1 heading found
No H1 means screen-reader users can't identify the page's primary topic, and Google's content-extraction degrades.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€1,077 investment → €7,881/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 8.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 5.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- 7 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 556ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120,500,000
- 4 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)GDPR: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
- 4 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)GDPR: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- 4 non-essential cookie(s) set BEFORE consent (CMP misconfigured)ePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
- No H1 heading foundEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€2,957 /mo
+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 1.07
Bandwidth Waste
€0.22 /mo
2982.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~298 KB per page loadSaves €0.22/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
4.91 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
7.99 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
556 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.016
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.91 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
8.86 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
671 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
783 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
37 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.12 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
923 ms
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
No H1 heading found
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of core-js sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
HSTS, on Emotion
Stack Architecture
Adjust 
Cart Functionality 
HTTP/3 
Polyfill 3
RSS 
core-js 3.10.2
Emotion All Detected Technologies (8)
Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.
Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Polyfill is a service which accepts a request for a set of browser features and returns only the polyfills that are needed by the requesting browser.
RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
Adjust is the mobile marketing analytics platform.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/282ba93e-c7eb-472b-b3f7-33de4dad3aa0)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/282ba93e-c7eb-472b-b3f7-33de4dad3aa0"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theguardian.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 13h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · No H1 heading found
- · Cookie 'gu_client_ab_tests' is missing the Secure flag
- · Cookie 'gu_v2_mvt_id' is missing the Secure flag
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+1Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source