Skip to content
AU · AUD (A$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: Privacy Act 1988 · DDA Dev cost: A$ 110/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 14:05 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
51.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 661ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (241ms), slowest from Singapore (1025ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
623ms
DNS 311ms · TLS 109ms
United Stated - New York
510ms
DNS 479ms · TLS 16ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
820ms
DNS 525ms · TLS 104ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
750ms
DNS 357ms · TLS 135ms
Singapore - Singapore
1025ms
DNS 281ms · TLS 252ms
United States - Santa Clara
241ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 75ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 661ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

2 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

70 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 8.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

AUD 348 investment → AUD 17,438/month returns + AUD 50,200,000 risk avoided

Investment
AUD 348
3.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
AUD 17,438
AUD 209,256/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+59973% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided AUD 50,200,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
AUD 2380.0 mo payback · +87700% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
AUD 73 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

A$348 3.2 developer hours at A$110/hr
Quick wins
A$73 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

A$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

AUD 4,192,704 / month at risk ~AUD 50,312,453 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

AUD 50,200,000

Privacy Act 1988DDA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    Privacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    Privacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    Privacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    Privacy Act 1988: AUD 66,000 – AUD 50,000,000
  • No <main> landmark found
    DDA: AUD 5,000 – AUD 200,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    DDA: AUD 5,000 – AUD 200,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    DDA: AUD 5,000 – AUD 200,000
  • 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
    DDA: AUD 5,000 – AUD 200,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

AUD 9,370 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: AUD 3.50

Bandwidth Waste

AUD 0.88 /mo

7171.1 MB/mo × 0.123 AUD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~717 KB per page load
    Saves AUD 0.88/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

61
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.69 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.66 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

162 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.95 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.75 s

Desktop

60
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
82
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.61 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.01 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.320

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.01 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3769 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Accessibility P96Infrastructure P6Performance P81SEO P33Content P38Sustainability P57

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1751 peers
You 82
·
Avg 74
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P99Accessibility P97Infrastructure P4Performance P78SEO P37Content P41Sustainability P49

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Nginx CDN

4 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (4)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=y2oewhoxb5upbs70iwfu9gnianfaq5bo-k9fzzzbskw
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frjwdigital.com.au)](https://beavercheck.com/results/2c6114c7-9d02-403b-8b88-8f4c09fef09d)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/2c6114c7-9d02-403b-8b88-8f4c09fef09d"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frjwdigital.com.au" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Frjwdigital.com.au

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 70 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 2h → B (87)
  • · 2 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback