Skip to content
https://caixa.gov.br Export & share
BR · BRL (R$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: LGPD Dev cost: R$ 180/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-25 01:14 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
3.4m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 875ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (107ms), slowest from Singapore (1441ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
1441ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 43ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
107ms
DNS 2ms · TLS 7ms
Spain - Madrid
601ms
DNS 321ms · TLS 27ms
United Stated - New York
1006ms
DNS 123ms · TLS 5ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1178ms
DNS 199ms · TLS 29ms
United States - Santa Clara
916ms
DNS 128ms · TLS 15ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 875ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Infrastructure, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'security' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 12.4 MB (8.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 28.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 28.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

BRL 1,215 investment → BRL 2,193/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
BRL 1.215
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
BRL 2.193
BRL 26.321/yr
Payback
0.6 mo
+2066% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided BRL 50.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
BRL 1.1250.5 mo payback · +2240% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
BRL 135 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~36%.

Barriers
10
4 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+36pp
added vs baseline
Score
42
D
Speed
2
Trust
3
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 28.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 26.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.0s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

R$1,215 6.8 developer hours at R$180/hr
Quick wins
R$135 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

R$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

BRL 2.193 / month at risk ~BRL 26.321 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

BRL 50.000.000

LGPD
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    LGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

BRL 2.182 /mo

+36.4pp bounce · ~3,637 lost visitors/mo

CPC: BRL 0.60

Bandwidth Waste

BRL 11 /mo

26910.3 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.7 MB per page load
    Saves BRL 11/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

33
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

8.73 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

28.93 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.01 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.035

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

17.61 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

32.09 s

Desktop

60
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.79 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.19 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

98 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.009

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.92 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.89 s

Categories

8
Avg score 72.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 550 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Compliance P6Content P6Accessibility P91Security P90Performance P78Sustainability P27SEO P29

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 66% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
CMS · 1724 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 59% of CMS sites

Technology stack

Microsoft SharePoint

15 technologies detected 4 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Microsoft Clarity
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
CMS
Microsoft SharePoint
Framework
AdOpt Font Awesome 6HSTS Microsoft ASP.NET Priority Hints Svelte Swiper jQuery 3.7.1 jQuery UI 1.14.0

All Detected Technologies (15)

SharePoint is a cloud-based collaborative platform to manage and share content.

Categories CMS Website https://sharepoint.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

AdOpt is a consent tool that prioritises privacy and usability towards the LGPD.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://goadopt.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Svelte is a free and open-source front end compiler created by Rich Harris and maintained by the Svelte core team members.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://svelte.dev Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://swiperjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-PD5EBJFQ7X&cx=c&gtm=4e65k1

Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.

Categories Analytics Website https://clarity.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and Svelte are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

No build tool detected

A framework (AdOpt) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaixa.gov.br)](https://beavercheck.com/results/2d15b20e-1fd0-480c-b31d-54eff5a9e3e0)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/2d15b20e-1fd0-480c-b31d-54eff5a9e3e0"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaixa.gov.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcaixa.gov.br

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (85)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (82)
  • · Page weighs 12.4 MB (8.6 MB transferred)
  • · Cookie 'security' is missing the Secure flag
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (85)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback