Skip to content
CH · CHF (CHF) · Estimated Applicable regulations: nDSG/FADP Dev cost: CHF 130/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-09-20 12:18 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
36.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 248ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (95ms), slowest from Singapore (584ms). Document on Netlify; assets also on imgix. Cache-Control header is missing. 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
301ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 142ms
United Stated - New York
97ms
DNS 36ms · TLS 44ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
250ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 132ms
United States - Santa Clara
95ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 72ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
158ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 140ms
Singapore - Singapore
584ms
DNS 159ms · TLS 222ms
CDN: Netlify · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 248ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

cleanspace.ch fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 3

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 4

18 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CHF 509 investment → CHF 13,522/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CHF 509
3.9 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CHF 13’522
CHF 162’264/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+31769% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CHF 250’000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CHF 4770.0 mo payback · +33941% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CHF 119 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CHF509 3.9 developer hours at CHF130/hr
Quick wins
CHF119 3 fixes in ~55 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CHF /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CHF 8’568 / month at risk ~CHF 102’812 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CHF 250’000

nDSG/FADP
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CHF 8’567 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CHF 3.20

Bandwidth Waste

CHF 0.58 /mo

8197.0 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~820 KB per page load
    Saves CHF 0.58/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.73 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.73 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.82 s

Desktop

91
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.19 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.19 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.59 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1251 peers
You 80
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P7Content P10SEO P12Infrastructure P14Accessibility P86Performance P80Security P80Sustainability P79

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 65 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 3071 peers
You 80
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Content P6Compliance P8Infrastructure P10Accessibility P77SEO P28Performance P69Security P69Sustainability P68

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 97+ on Content; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 70% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Netlify CDN

4 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Font API HSTS
CDN
Netlify Netlify CDN

All Detected Technologies (4)

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M2ZC1MY0W3R1ZHCH0VA001VF

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanspace.ch)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/cleanspace.ch)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/cleanspace.ch"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanspace.ch" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cleanspace.ch

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 18 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · 2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (87)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback