Skip to content
https://sitiscommesse.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
59
TTFB stable →
655ms
FCP stable →
2.7s
LCP stable →
6.3s
Scanned
2026-10-02 17:03 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.7m
Vs prev
Improved by +1

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 303ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (34ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (655ms). Document and assets on Cloudflare. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
655ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 14ms
Spain - Madrid
176ms
DNS 43ms · TLS 26ms
Singapore - Singapore
34ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 9ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
111ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 17ms
United Stated - New York
321ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 13ms
United States - Santa Clara
524ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 11ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 303ms · Cache: no-cache

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

sitiscommesse.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 3

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
Warning: 4

25 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 5

93 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 6.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 6.3s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€460 investment → €6,231/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€460
5.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€6.231
€74.769/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16139% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€439 → 0.1 mo payback · +16925% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€35 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 6.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 26 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 453ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€460 5.4 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€35 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€3.113 / month at risk ~€37.357 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 2 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€3.113 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,14 /mo

1832.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~183 KB per page load
    Saves €0,14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

59
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.71 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.33 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

453 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.104

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.96 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.42 s

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.18 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.95 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.38 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.96 s

Categories

8
Avg score 85.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 721 peers
You 85
·
Avg 75
+10 above average
0 50 100
Sustainability P97SEO P90Performance P89Accessibility P88Security P82Content P29Compliance P36Infrastructure P48

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
WordPress · 1025 peers
You 85
·
Avg 76
+9 above average
0 50 100
Sustainability P96Accessibility P89SEO P87Security P86Performance P83Content P21Compliance P33Infrastructure P36

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 80 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 92% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, with Cloudflare CDN

9 technologies detected 4 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
CMS
WordPress
Framework
Cloudflare Bot Management HSTS HTTP/3 LazySizes Open Graph core-js 3.6.5
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (9)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CMS Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Link URL: https://www.sitiscommesse.com/wp-content/themes/generel/minified/style-index-new-homepage.css?version=1790784310

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/en-gb/products/bot-management/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.

Categories JavaScript libraries, Performance Website https://github.com/aFarkas/lazysizes Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare Bot Management) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsitiscommesse.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/sitiscommesse.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/sitiscommesse.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsitiscommesse.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsitiscommesse.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 93 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · 25 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 5h → A (92)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Send Feedback