Skip to content
https://letseat.charlietheturtle.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
88
TTFB stable →
74ms
FCP stable →
2.9s
LCP stable →
3.1s
Scanned
2026-09-03 14:03 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 88ms across 6 locations, fastest from Singapore (69ms), slowest from Madrid (127ms). Cloudflare edge cache (HIT).

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
74ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 19ms
Spain - Madrid
127ms
DNS 40ms · TLS 25ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
84ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 12ms
United States - Santa Clara
102ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 36ms
United Stated - New York
74ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 16ms
Singapore - Singapore
69ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 16ms
CDN: Cloudflare (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 88ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

charlietheturtle.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

/.git/config is publicly accessible

Sensitive resource publicly accessible — restrict access or remove.

Security › Information Leakage
Critical: 2

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 3

4 third-party resources (70% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 4

Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Server Response Intelligence
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 3.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 3.1s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€383 investment → €3,175/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€383
4.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€3.175
€38.101/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9861% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2980.1 mo payback · +12707% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+22pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
3
  • 9 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • Page loads in 3.1s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 553ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€383 4.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€43 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.323 / month at risk ~€27.878 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.323 /mo

+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 1.07

Bandwidth Waste

€0,03 /mo

391.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~39 KB per page load
    Saves €0,03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.90 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.05 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.005

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.36 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.05 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

838 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

838 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.027

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

838 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

838 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 82.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 646 peers
You 84
·
Avg 74
+10 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Sustainability P99Performance P97Compliance P4Infrastructure P6Content P12Accessibility P82SEO P26

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Google Font API · 1187 peers
You 84
·
Avg 74
+10 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Sustainability P99Compliance P3Performance P96Infrastructure P6Content P16Accessibility P84SEO P26

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, with Cloudflare CDN

7 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 Slice Upserve
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (7)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Slice is an online food ordering platform for independent pizzerias.

Categories Reservations & delivery Website https://slicelife.com/owners Detected by BeaverCheck

Upserve is a restaurant management solution featuring an Android or iOS-based point-of-sale system, online ordering, contactless payments, automated inventory management, sales analytics, and more.

Categories Reservations & delivery Website https://onlineordering.upserve.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fletseat.charlietheturtle.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/charlietheturtle.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/charlietheturtle.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fletseat.charlietheturtle.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fletseat.charlietheturtle.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 4 third-party resources (70% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · /.git/config is publicly accessible
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · Compressed response missing `Vary` header

Send Feedback