Audit overview
Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Page weighs 16.9 MB (8.9 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
17 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
24 button(s) with no accessible text
Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.
9 image(s) missing alt attribute
Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.
No <main> landmark found
Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€227 investment → €10,111/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.
- Page takes 17.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 14.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 7.4sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 17 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance→ Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€10.109 /mo
+31.2pp bounce · ~3,119 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 3.24
Bandwidth Waste
€2,07 /mo
27905.0 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.8 MB per page loadSaves €2,07/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.49 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
16.97 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
7.39 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.396
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
7.57 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
20.85 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.22 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.04 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.81 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.057
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.29 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.99 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 16.9 MB (8.9 MB transferred)
Security
All checks pass
Accessibility
17 link(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Cloudflare Bot Management sites score 96+ on Sustainability; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Facebook sites score 70+ on Accessibility; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Cloudflare Bot Management, on Emotion, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Facebook Pixel 
Google Ads 
Google Ads Conversion Tracking 
Linkedin Insight Tag 
Cloudflare Bot Management Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
HTTP/3 Microsoft 
Normalize.css 
Open Graph 
Emotion Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (15)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.
Cloudflare bot management solution identifies and mitigates automated traffic to protect websites from bad bots.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Normalize.css is a CSS library that makes browsers render elements according to modern standards by targeting only the styles that require normalization.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.
Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.
LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Cloudflare Bot Management) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/30baa6c3-9670-4600-99f2-84989843a440)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/30baa6c3-9670-4600-99f2-84989843a440"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fahrefs.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fahrefs.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 3h total → projected B (86)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 16.9 MB (8.9 MB transferred)
- · No <main> landmark found
- · 17 link(s) with no accessible text
- · 24 button(s) with no accessible text
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 9 image(s) missing alt attribute