Skip to content
SE · SEK (kr) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: SEK 850/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
55
TTFB stable →
386ms
FCP stable →
2.5s
LCP stable →
12.8s
Scanned
2026-10-15 10:25 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
37.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 288ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (220ms), slowest from Santa Clara (416ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
221ms
DNS 39ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
220ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 41ms
United Stated - New York
230ms
DNS 81ms · TLS 10ms
United States - Santa Clara
416ms
DNS 34ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
259ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
380ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 11ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 288ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

froga.io fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Bot Challenge Detection
Critical: 2

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 5

82 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 10.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

SEK 6,375 investment → SEK 96,849/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
SEK 6.375
7.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
SEK 96.849
SEK 1.162.188/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18130% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
SEK 1.275 → 0.0 mo payback · +91052% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
SEK 1.275 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 10.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 8.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 212ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • HSTS is enabled but max-age is short (15552000s)
    First-visit protection is in place, but browsers forget the policy sooner than recommended
    → Raise Strict-Transport-Security max-age to at least 31536000 (1 year)
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

kr6,375 7.5 developer hours at kr850/hr
Quick wins
kr1,275 3 fixes in ~90 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

kr /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

SEK 60.026 / month at risk ~SEK 720.318 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

SEK 60.022 /mo

+27.3pp bounce · ~2,728 lost visitors/mo

CPC: SEK 22.00

Bandwidth Waste

SEK 4,91 /mo

5826.2 MB/mo × 0.842 SEK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~583 KB per page load
    Saves SEK 4,91/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

67
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.54 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

212 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.11 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.57 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
94
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

455 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

928 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

550 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

934 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 82.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AngularJS · 489 peers
You 83
·
Avg 74
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P8Performance P90SEO P88Accessibility P84Security P81Content P77Infrastructure P61Sustainability P56

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 90% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →
Cloudflare Turnstile · 516 peers
You 83
·
Avg 75
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P8Performance P91Accessibility P83SEO P83Security P80Content P74Infrastructure P59Sustainability P57

Top 10% of Cloudflare Turnstile sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Cloudflare Turnstile sites See full Cloudflare Turnstile benchmark →

Technology stack

AngularJS, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
AngularJS Cloudflare Turnstile Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/g/4df4a60fa397/api.js?onload=zeEi4&render=explicit
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=ap0yK4nSz-FvqTa3vai2nindMxiRYftuJVKsfEZfKwk

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffroga.io)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/froga.io)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/froga.io"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffroga.io" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffroga.io

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 2h → B (89)
  • · Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (91)
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
  • · 82 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback