Skip to content
US · USD ($) · Estimated Applicable regulations: CCPA/CPRA · ADA Title III Dev cost: $100/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 19:01 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
51.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility and Compliance need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 2

2 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

66 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Certificate expires soon (8 days remaining)

Cert expiry within the renewal window — fix now while there's no user impact, instead of after expiry when there's a full outage.

Security › TLS & Certificates
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 10.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$200 investment → $14,680/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$200
2.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$14,680
$176,166/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+87983% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1500.0 mo payback · +117344% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~37%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+37pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 10.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 234ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$200 2.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$200 4 fixes in ~120 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,865 / month at risk ~$118,383 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,865 /mo

+36.7pp bounce · ~3,667 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.22 /mo

2763.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~276 KB per page load
    Saves $0.22/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

54
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.64 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.28 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

234 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.89 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.58 s

Desktop

85
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.29 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.028

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.29 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2557 peers
You 75
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P7Accessibility P9SEO P15Security P76Performance P70Infrastructure P65Content P65Sustainability P50

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 48% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1498 peers
You 75
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P6Accessibility P9SEO P20Security P77Sustainability P34Content P65Performance P62Infrastructure P57

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 44% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS

4 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
PayU Payment
Framework
HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph

All Detected Technologies (4)

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

PayU is a provider of financial solutions for ecommerce, facilitating online payments and related transaction services.

Categories Payment processors Website https://corporate.payu.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fm.me)](https://beavercheck.com/results/34187cf9-b4e9-4c7b-b5cd-bffc556cdd61)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/34187cf9-b4e9-4c7b-b5cd-bffc556cdd61"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fm.me" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fm.me

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 2h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 2h → B (81)
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 2 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 66 third-party resources (100% of weight)
  • · Certificate expires soon (8 days remaining)

Send Feedback