Skip to content
IN · INR (₹) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DPDP Act Dev cost: ₹1,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
51
TTFB improving ↑
661ms
FCP stable →
5.3s
LCP degrading ↓
9.5s
Scanned
2026-10-23 15:33 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev
Improved by +2

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 587ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (213ms), slowest from Singapore (1201ms). Document on Cloudflare; assets also on Fastly. 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
815ms
DNS 344ms · TLS 18ms
Spain - Madrid
370ms
DNS 163ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
213ms
DNS 136ms · TLS 15ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
626ms
DNS 273ms · TLS 26ms
United States - Santa Clara
297ms
DNS 56ms · TLS 22ms
Singapore - Singapore
1201ms
DNS 422ms · TLS 21ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · document + assets · Avg TTFB: 587ms · Cache: public, max-age=0

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

kashipixel.in fails 2 mail checks: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

3 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 5

24 third-party resources (66% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₹21,000 investment → ₹127,012/month returns + INR 2,500,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
₹21,000
14.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₹1,27,012
₹15,24,139/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7158% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided INR 2,50,00,00,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₹20,250 → 0.2 mo payback · +7427% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₹750 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 542ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₹21,000 14.0 developer hours at ₹1500/hr
Quick wins
₹750 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

₹ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₹77,978 / month at risk ~₹9,35,740 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

₹2,50,00,00,000

DPDP Act
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DPDP Act: INR 10,000 – INR 2,50,00,00,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    DPDP Act: INR 10,000 – INR 2,50,00,00,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

₹77,954 /mo

+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo

CPC: INR 30.00

Bandwidth Waste

₹24 /mo

3617.6 MB/mo × 6.667 INR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~362 KB per page load
    Saves ₹24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

52
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.79 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.84 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

542 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.05 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.67 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.45 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.66 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

11 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.63 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.66 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1455 peers
You 84
·
Avg 76
+8 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Compliance P14Performance P78Sustainability P75Accessibility P73SEO P72Content P35Infrastructure P36

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
Google Search Console · 4445 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Security P92Compliance P10Accessibility P83Performance P80SEO P76Sustainability P75Infrastructure P34Content P41

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, hosted on Render, with Cloudflare CDN

13 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Lucide Open Graph React React Router 7.18.1 Tailwind CSS
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Render

All Detected Technologies (13)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Render is a cloud computing platform that provides a wide range of services, including web hosting, cloud computing, and application development. Render offers several hosting options, including static site hosting, web application hosting, and managed databases.

Categories PaaS Website https://render.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=TBAblEB2Qyw0EFT_3mO5Ui-1kbNe-35vN5_JCFMpwiY

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 258 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-9J5YR38T5M

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkashipixel.in)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/kashipixel.in)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/kashipixel.in"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkashipixel.in" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkashipixel.in

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (86)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 24 third-party resources (66% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → B (88)
  • · 3 image(s) missing alt attribute

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (91)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback